The Shocking State of Psychiatry in Sri Lanka

By | POLITICAL PSYCHIATRY

The Shocking State of Psychiatry in Sri Lanka

Published on 1st October 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
610

Enter more text here

Angoda Psychiatric Facility aka National Institute of Mental Health

‘Angoda’ was the location where I was going to be transferred to for the [fraudulent] Electroconvulsive Therapy, that had been planned by Edward de Saram, Newton Ranasinghe and their cross-border associates.

Before I go into detail, I would like to present information on the psychiatric situation in Sri Lanka. 

Deteriorating conditions in Sri Lankan psychiatric hospitals

Under conditions in which the incidence of psychiatric disorders is on the rise in Sri Lanka, there has been a marked deterioration in the state of the country’s major mental institutions. Declining government health funding has resulted in understaffing, poor accommodation and a lack of necessary drugs and equipment.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus eu purus id massa luctus tempor. Etiam sed ex justo. Nulla maximus enim vitae vulputate ullamcorper. Quisque vehicula vitae turpis vitae sodales. Morbi fermentum nibh elit, a vehicula purus aliquet eu. Donec iaculis neque a dolor ultricies tincidunt. In volutpat augue erat, in maximus lorem pharetra auctor. Cras tempor scelerisque placerat. Cras vitae erat ex. Suspendisse tincidunt diam vitae nisl fringilla aliquam. Etiam vel tempor ipsum.

Sri Lanka struggles with mental health burden

Nearly a year after the brutal civil war in Sri Lanka was declared over by the government, Nayanah Siva reports on the mental health problems facing the conflict-scarred population.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus eu purus id massa luctus tempor. Etiam sed ex justo. Nulla maximus enim vitae vulputate ullamcorper. Quisque vehicula vitae turpis vitae sodales. Morbi fermentum nibh elit, a vehicula purus aliquet eu. Donec iaculis neque a dolor ultricies tincidunt. In volutpat augue erat, in maximus lorem pharetra auctor. Cras tempor scelerisque placerat. Cras vitae erat ex. Suspendisse tincidunt diam vitae nisl fringilla aliquam. Etiam vel tempor ipsum.

From hell to heaven

Reminiscent of regalia of the British Empire, a tall elegant building stands in a strangely spacious land in the suburb of Colombo, Angoda. The building was constructed by the British as far back as 1929 albeit it still stands tall amidst host of other buildings that make up the Angoda Mental (Teaching) Hospital...

which RECO

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

Fundamental Human Rights Violations via Political Psychiatry

By | POLITICAL PSYCHIATRY
extrajudicial-psychiatric-detention-joseph-de-saram-rhodium-linkedin

Fundamental Human Rights Violations via Political Psychiatry

Published on 1st October 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
764

Enter more text here

“I have a very particular set of skills, skills I’ve acquired over a very long career, skills that make me a nightmare for people…”

Background

As is obvious from my LinkedIn Articles I have outstanding Intelligence Analysis skills as well as Cryptographic, Forensic and Legal. Technical Surveillance Countermeasures (“TSCM”) is the one that I am having to use at the moment, but I am an expert on Signals Intelligence (“SIGINT”) and Communications Security (“COMSEC”).

And to top it all off I am a

Human Rights Activist

so

MY ADVERSARIES ALWAYS HAVE A STRONG POLITICAL MOTIVE

to make a nuisance of themselves…

Please refer to this article:-

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus eu purus id massa luctus tempor. Etiam sed ex justo. Nulla maximus enim vitae vulputate ullamcorper. Quisque vehicula vitae turpis vitae sodales. Morbi fermentum nibh elit, a vehicula purus aliquet eu. Donec iaculis neque a dolor ultricies tincidunt. In volutpat augue erat, in maximus lorem pharetra auctor. Cras tempor scelerisque placerat. Cras vitae erat ex. Suspendisse tincidunt diam vitae nisl fringilla aliquam. Etiam vel tempor ipsum.

Iatrogenesis in Psychiatric Fraud

Please add me to your connections and read other unusual articles relating to Information Security, Forensics, and Fundamental Human Rights...

THE FOLL

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus eu purus id massa luctus tempor. Etiam sed ex justo. Nulla maximus enim vitae vulputate ullamcorper. Quisque vehicula vitae turpis vitae sodales. Morbi fermentum nibh elit, a vehicula purus aliquet eu. Donec iaculis neque a dolor ultricies tincidunt. In volutpat augue erat, in maximus lorem pharetra auctor. Cras tempor scelerisque placerat. Cras vitae erat ex. Suspendisse tincidunt diam vitae nisl fringilla aliquam. Etiam vel tempor ipsum.

Political Abuse of Psychiatry—An Historical Overview

The use of psychiatry for political purposes has been a major subject of debate within the world psychiatric community during the second half of the 20th century. The issue became prominent in the 1970s and 1980s due to the systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union,...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus eu purus id massa luctus tempor. Etiam sed ex justo. Nulla maximus enim vitae vulputate ullamcorper. Quisque vehicula vitae turpis vitae sodales. Morbi fermentum nibh elit, a vehicula purus aliquet eu. Donec iaculis neque a dolor ultricies tincidunt. In volutpat augue erat, in maximus lorem pharetra auctor. Cras tempor scelerisque placerat. Cras vitae erat ex. Suspendisse tincidunt diam vitae nisl fringilla aliquam. Etiam vel tempor ipsum.

Political Abuse of Psychiatry in the Soviet Union and China: A Rough Guide for Bystanders

The fundamental issue really concerns the morality of the by- stander. In most cases, most of us are neither victims nor per- petrators of human rights violations; we occupy the role of bystanders. Even though some of us may intellectually appreci- ate the ethical duty to aid and rescue suffering strangers, by far the greater number of us are sitting behind ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus eu purus id massa luctus tempor. Etiam sed ex justo. Nulla maximus enim vitae vulputate ullamcorper. Quisque vehicula vitae turpis vitae sodales. Morbi fermentum nibh elit, a vehicula purus aliquet eu. Donec iaculis neque a dolor ultricies tincidunt. In volutpat augue erat, in maximus lorem pharetra auctor. Cras tempor scelerisque placerat. Cras vitae erat ex. Suspendisse tincidunt diam vitae nisl fringilla aliquam. Etiam vel tempor ipsum.

Ending political abuse of psychiatry: where we are at and what needs to be done

The number of reports of political activists falling victim to the political abuse of psychiatry is increasing. When the USSR first disintegrated, this practice virtually ceased to occur. What came in its place, however, was a disturbing collection of other forms of abuses, including human rights abuses, caused by a lack of resources, outdated treatment methods, a lack of understanding of individual human rights and a growing...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus eu purus id massa luctus tempor. Etiam sed ex justo. Nulla maximus enim vitae vulputate ullamcorper. Quisque vehicula vitae turpis vitae sodales. Morbi fermentum nibh elit, a vehicula purus aliquet eu. Donec iaculis neque a dolor ultricies tincidunt. In volutpat augue erat, in maximus lorem pharetra auctor. Cras tempor scelerisque placerat. Cras vitae erat ex. Suspendisse tincidunt diam vitae nisl fringilla aliquam. Etiam vel tempor ipsum.

Political Abuse of Psychiatry—An Historical Overview

The use of psychiatry for political purposes has been a major subject of debate within the world psychiatric community during the second half of the 20th century.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus eu purus id massa luctus tempor. Etiam sed ex justo. Nulla maximus enim vitae vulputate ullamcorper. Quisque vehicula vitae turpis vitae sodales. Morbi fermentum nibh elit, a vehicula purus aliquet eu. Donec iaculis neque a dolor ultricies tincidunt. In volutpat augue erat, in maximus lorem pharetra auctor. Cras tempor scelerisque placerat. Cras vitae erat ex. Suspendisse tincidunt diam vitae nisl fringilla aliquam. Etiam vel tempor ipsum.

Psychiatry as a tool of coercion in post-soviet countries

Since the disintegration of the Soviet Union there have been repeated reports of a renewed use of psychiatry for political purposes.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus eu purus id massa luctus tempor. Etiam sed ex justo. Nulla maximus enim vitae vulputate ullamcorper. Quisque vehicula vitae turpis vitae sodales. Morbi fermentum nibh elit, a vehicula purus aliquet eu. Donec iaculis neque a dolor ultricies tincidunt. In volutpat augue erat, in maximus lorem pharetra auctor. Cras tempor scelerisque placerat. Cras vitae erat ex. Suspendisse tincidunt diam vitae nisl fringilla aliquam. Etiam vel tempor ipsum.

Psychiatry and Human Rights Abuses

"In some countries, the basic human rights of people with mental illnesses are not realized, often in the institutions designed to care for them--the psychiatric hospitals." This observation, made by Gro Harlem Brundtland, M.D., M.P.H., while she was director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO), is shared by many.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus eu purus id massa luctus tempor. Etiam sed ex justo. Nulla maximus enim vitae vulputate ullamcorper. Quisque vehicula vitae turpis vitae sodales. Morbi fermentum nibh elit, a vehicula purus aliquet eu. Donec iaculis neque a dolor ultricies tincidunt. In volutpat augue erat, in maximus lorem pharetra auctor. Cras tempor scelerisque placerat. Cras vitae erat ex. Suspendisse tincidunt diam vitae nisl fringilla aliquam. Etiam vel tempor ipsum.

Deteriorating conditions in Sri Lankan psychiatric hospitals

Under conditions in which the incidence of psychiatric disorders is on the rise in Sri Lanka, there has been a marked deterioration in the state of the country’s major mental institutions. Declining government health funding has resulted in understaffing, poor accommodation and a lack of necessary drugs and equipment.

THE FOLLOWING AUDIO RECORDINGS WERE FORENSICALLY EXTRACTED FROM THE MOBILE PHONE OF EDWARD DE SARAM (“EDS”) AFTER I MANAGED TO GET OUT OF THE PSYCHIATRIC FACILITY.

REMEMBER FOLKS, IT IS NOT MY VOICE ON THESE RECORDINGS, AND I AM NOT THE ONE WITH THE PROBLEM 🙂

Forensic Evidence

20151212 234006 01 Edward De Saram Newton Ranasinghe Team To Take JDS By Force

HANR – “Hello.

EDS – “Hello Newton, can you hear me?”

HANR – “Did you get the appointment.

EDS – “I got the appointment, but after that, Joe said he didn’t want to leave the house… [doctor] said that there is a team at Park Hospital, where if you call that team that they will come and take Joe.

[SIGH – EDS AND NEWTON RANASINGHE (“HANR”) FAILED MISERABLY BECAUSE I DO NOT HAVE A PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEM AND COULD DEFEND MYSELF DESPITE THE TORTURE AND EVERYTHING ELSE…

BECAUSE WHAT ENDED UP HAPPENING WAS A TEXTBOOK MILITARY INTELLIGENCE OPERATION INVOLVING IRREGULAR RENDITION PROTOCOLS:)]

20151212 234006 06 Edward De Saram Newton Ranasinghe Joe Does Not Leave The House

EDS – “But the problem with Joe is that he doesn’t leave the house.

[THE REASON I DO NOT LIKE GOING OUT IS BECAUSE I WOULD THEN HAVE TO DEAL WITH A CLASSLESS GROUP OF PEOPLE, DWELLING WITHIN A LAWLESS SOCIETY, WHO THINK IN THE SAME GROUPTHINK FASHION THAT EDS AND PDS DO.

ALSO BECAUSE OF MY HEART PROBLEMS I AM REALLY BEHIND ON COMMERCIAL MATTERS SUCH AS GLOBAL REGULARISATION. I AM SURE MY BUSINESS CONTACTS WOULD PREFER ME TO SIT AND HOME AND SORT OUT PROBLEMS THAN GO GALLIVANTING AROUND. AND OF COURSE IT IS DANGEROUS BECAUSE OF THE MASSIVE CORRUPTION AND CRIMINAL VIOLENCE.

THERE IS ANOTHER INTERESTING POINT – IF JOE DOESN’T LEAVE THE HOUSE HOW IS HE A DANGER TO HIMSELF AND TO OTHERS? HA HA!]

20151212 234006 07 Edward De Saram Newton Ranasinghe No Way Of Getting To Joe

EDS – “Even if a team went to Joe’s house, there is a front gate, the person who has the key for the gate is Joe, all keys for the inside doors of the house are with JoeSo for anyone to take Joe is impossible.

[WHY ARE THESE BABOONS OBSESSED IN TAKING ME ANYWAY? OH I FORGOT IT WAS FOR EXTRAJUDICIAL KILLING / IRREGULAR RENDITION.]

20151212 234006 09 Edward de Saram Newton Ranasinghe Need To Break Down Door

EDS – “Afterwards, I spoke to Upul in the night, after an afternoon call, Upali asking what can be done. Upali said then in that case, he has a friend who is in charge of Ungoda… but the problem his we can’t get [Joe] from out of the house. Joe says ‘can’t go out’. So the only way to get Joe is by breaking down the doors… I am not sure whether that can be done lawfully, for a private house… Joe is the lawyer, Joe knows the correct legal position…so tomorrow I am going to ask Gaya [Pathikirikorale] to see if we can get some [fraudulent] support [from the police].

[OF COURSE IT WAS UNLAWFUL WHICH IS WHY EDS WANTED TO FRAUDULENTLY OBTAIN MY LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP AS THE FIRST STEP.]

20151212 234006 30 Edward De Saram Newton Ranasinghe JDS Human Rights

The key parts of this recording are as follows:-

(a) “Police, Police Park Hospital” (there is no Police Park Hospital).

(b) The fact that ‘Human Rights’ ends up in the conversation between the perpetrators, in the context of that which is being proposed, demonstrating mens rea.

(c) The emphasis placed on ‘He needs treatment’, which is a signature feature of the many Covert Human Intelligence Sources used in this operation, in order to obfuscate the existence of same.

(d) And specifically ‘[Joe] needs to come [to the UK]‘ as opposed to ‘Joe needs treatment’ which was the primary [false] statement propagated to all and sundry, although it was actually an Irregular Rendition.

Conversation and Analysis

EDS – “Police, Police Park Hospital is where I am going to meet them.”

HANR“Right, okay.”

EDS“Then I will channel [the doctor] and speak to them.”

HANR“Right, right.”

EDS“And he will tell me the best way to [execute the plan].”

HANR“Yes.”

EDS“He needs treatment, but if he is refusing then we need to know, because [Joe] is the ‘legal man’, [Joe] knows it all like a lawyer.”

HANR“Hmm, but this is Ceylon Law.”

[EVEN UNDER THE LAWS OF SRI LANKA THAT WHICH IS BEING PROPOSED IS UNLAWFUL:-

Psychiatric Fraud - Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat

Ignorantia juris non excusat or ignorantia legis neminem excusat (Latin for "ignorance of the law excuses not" and "ignorance of law excuses no one"...

EDS – “Ceylon law it may be but Joe knows about Human Rights and he is always talking about it… in any event I will speak to some people… you and me talking about it makes no difference.

[MY FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS WERE/ARE CONTINUALLY TRASHED, WHICH HAS THE EFFECT OF ME FIGHTING EVEN HARDER FOR THEM.]

HANR – “[unclear].

EDS – “I know what to do, I will say ‘this is the fellow, he needs to come here [UK] , so then he will say these are the [unlawful] options that are available.

[EVEN UNDER THE LAWS OF SRI LANKA, THIS TYPE OF PROCEDURE IS UNLAWFUL SO I DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY WERE HOPING TO ACHIEVE BY GOING AROUND IN A SAD CRIMINAL FASHION SLAGGING ME OFF AND TRYING TO GET PEOPLE TO AGREE WITH THEM.]

20151212 234006 Excerpt 36

HANR – “That you can tell…

EDS – “That I will be telling the doctor and I will be telling the crash team as well.

HANR – “Yeah, yeah.

EDS – “I will speak with [Upali] about that.

HANR – “Yes, yes.

EDS – “I will speak to them and give you the feedback, do you understand, there’s no point me taking your advice because I need to know the local scene.

HANR – “Yes, yes.

EDS – “If [Joe] was co-operating then that’s fine. Ranjit’s group will get together and take him by forceJoe knows the law… he will immediately look up the internet and will know what is possible what will happen… if I mention ECT, Joe will look up the internet, Google and will look… then what happens if Joe says ‘I don’t want ECT’ then what do we do?

HANR – “Yes, yes.

[THIS AGREEMENT BY EDS AND HANR CONFIRMS THAT ECT WAS INTENDED FOR ME, AND MY CONSENT WAS DELIBERATELY NOT SOUGHT BECAUSE I WOULD HAVE REJECTED IT. THIS CONFIRMS THE ATTEMPTED MURDER AND CONFIRMS THAT THE GARBAGE ABOUT ME HAVING NO INSIGHT IS ENTIRELY FALSE.

EDS CONFIRMS HIMSELF THAT IF HE MENTIONED ECT TO ME (IE REQUIRE MY INFORMED CONSENT) IT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. THIS EXPLAINS WHY THERE WERE THE MASSIVE AMOUNT OF LIES THAT EDS AND PDS HAVE BEEN DISSEMINATING.

PARTIES IN SRI LANKA WANTED TO HARM ME, AND THREE UK CITIZENS, ALL DOCTORS, EDS, HANR AND PDS WERE TOO SPINELESS TO DEFEND ME, INSTEAD JOINING THEM IN THE FURTHERANCE OF THE ORIGINAL FRAUD AND FACILITATING THE IRREGULAR RENDITION AS INSTRUCTED BY OTHER UK PARTIES.]

EDS – “Now in your situation, there isn’t such a group… they went there, an injection was given, Joe knows the subject, he confronts people.

[WELL DUH! SO MAYBE THEY SHOULD HAVE NOT TAKEN ME ON.]

HANR – “Yes.

EDS – “So that’s the problem.

[YES IT IS A PROBLEM IF PARTIES WANT TO INJURE ME VIA CRIMINAL ACTS.]

HANR – “See if you can [unclear].

EDS – “[unclear] I will try and call and give an update.

Conclusion

That which was being proposed was in fact an

* * EXTRAJUDICIAL PROCESS – KILLING OR RENDITION * *

and as can be heard both EDS and NXR knew 5 DAYS BEFORE, that which they were proposing was

* * ENTIRELY UNLAWFUL * *

They continually reminded themselves that they needed to be careful because of my knowledge of the law, which is incredibly bizarre if they were actually acting within it.

Any right-thinking person can see the various flaws in their fraud as they were conducting it, but sadly none of them have any insight – odd how they say that of me but this phenomena is called Psychological Projection.

Absolutely Spineless

These ShitLankansTM have neither the brains nor the balls to run an operation such as this against me – this is the relevance of the ‘Restricted Patient’ label:-

The Restricted Patient

[One of my favourite films, and even this as a Spying / Military Theme can you believe? Ha ha] What is a Restricted Patient Restricted patients are persons detained in hospital under a compulsion order with a restriction order. They have usually committed an offence punishable by imprisonment but as a result of mental disorder are not imprisoned but ordered to be detained in hospital for treatment, without limit of time.

which RECONFIRMS THE OFFICIAL NATURE 🙂

The bottom line is:-

“You can take the monkey out of the jungle but you can’t take the jungle out of the monkey.”

The case continues…

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

Psychiatric Fraud Denied ‘The Right Against Self-Incrimination’

By | POLITICAL PSYCHIATRY
psychiatric-fraud-denied-the-right-against-self-incrimination-by-joseph-de-seram-linkedin

Psychiatric Fraud Denied 'The Right Against Self-Incrimination' ±

Published on 2nd November 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
602

Enter more text here

The right to remain silent is a legal right recognized, explicitly or by convention, in many of the world’s legal systems.

The right covers a number of issues centered on the right of the accused or the defendant to refuse to comment or provide an answer when questioned, either prior to or during legal proceedings in a court of law.

This can be the right to avoid self-incrimination or the right to remain silent when questioned. The right usually includes the provision that adverse comments or inferences cannot be made by the judge or jury regarding the refusal by a defendant to answer questions before or during a trial, hearing or any other legal proceeding. This right constitutes only a small part of the defendant’s rights as a whole.

This article confirms the legal basis by which Perversion of the Course of Justice has occurred, and as a direct result of the Psychiatric Fraud.

My ‘Right Against Self-Incrimination’ has been REMOVED ENTIRELY!!

Case Law – de Mel v Haniffa

The case of de Mel v Haniffa contains an EXPLICIT DECISION – it was UNEQUIVOCALLY HELD by a Bench of three Judges that:-

“An accused person cannot be compelled to produce, during the pendency of criminal proceedings which had been instituted against him, any documents in his possession which may provide evidence against him.”

https://www.lawnet.gov.lk/1977/12/31/r-a-de-mel-et-al-petitioners-and-haniffa-respondent/

“Gratiaen J observed: “To my mind, it is implicit in the scheme of our law that here, as in England, once proceedings have been initiated against an accused person, he is placed in a special category separating him and others in a like situation from the generality of mankind until the verdict has been pronounced. The precarious position in which he stands entitles him at the same time to protection in certain respects, and this is the basis of the special rule whereby he cannot be compelled or legally required to contribute to the proof of his alleged guilt by giving or providing, even indirectly, evidence against himself”.

THE PSYCHIATRIC FRAUD SPECTACULARLY BYPASSED THIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT BY THE EXFILTRATION OF DATA AND OTHER MY MATERIALS FROM MY HOME, AS WELL AS MATERIALS THAT WERE SUBJECT TO LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE.

This is the relevance of the term Restricted Patient, and well as the relevance to the Psychiatric Fraud itself – it was not a defence that EDS was trying to assist me with – he was actually acting in the capacity of an agent of law enforcement when he was facilitating the perversion of the course of justice ON THEIR BEHALF!

The Restricted Patient

One of my favourite films, and even this as a Spying / Military Theme can you believe? Ha ha] What is a Restricted Patient Restricted patients are...

The Constitutional Right to Remain Silent

The “right to remain silent” is well-known to anyone who watches movies or TV shows about police, but the constitutional rights that the statement represents are not always very well understood. The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects people from being compelled to give testimony that could incriminate them. This is not the same as saying that a person has a right to silence at all times. In some situations, police may use silence itself as incriminating evidence. The Supreme Court has held that police must stop questioning suspects once they assert their right to counsel, but it has also held that a person must affirmatively invoke the right to silence.

Silence at Trial

The Fifth Amendment states that “[n]o person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” The right to silence is among the Miranda rights that police must recite during or shortly after an arrest. The primary application of this right occurs during criminal court proceedings, where prosecutors are not allowed to call the defendant as a witness. The defendant has sole discretion over whether to testify at trial, and prosecutors may not comment if the defendant decides not to do so. Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965); Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222 (1971).

Immunity

An exception to the right against self-incrimination in court applies if prosecutors have granted the person immunity from prosecution. The Supreme Court has held that the immunity provisions of federal law offer the same protections as the Fifth Amendment. Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 462 (1972).

Silence During Police Interviews or Interrogations

The question of whether a person has a right to silence, essentially meaning a right to refuse to speak to police or answer their questions, has no simple answer. As a very general rule, no one is obligated to speak to the police, but even non-verbal communication can, in some situations, be incriminating.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), which gave us the well-known Miranda warnings, requires police to cease any and all interrogation once a person has invoked the right to an attorney, and it holds that any statements made afterwards are inadmissible in court. This only applies, however, after police have advised the person of their Miranda rights, which they are only obligated to do once they have placed that person under arrest.

Failure to Invoke the Right to Silence

Two recent court cases illustrate situations when a person’s silence could be used against him or her, without violating the Fifth Amendment or Miranda. Both involve failure by the defendant to assert the right to silence.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Salinas v. Texas, 570 U.S. __ (2013), dealt with a situation in which the defendant spoke to the police voluntarily during a murder investigation, meaning that he was not under arrest when the purportedly incriminating event occurred.

When the police officer asked the defendant about his possible involvement in the murder, the officer testified, the defendant became very quiet, and his entire demeanor changed.

[EDS CONTINUALLY DROPS HIS VOICE TO A WHISPER WHEN HE KNOWS THAT HE IS DOING OR ABOUT TO DO ANYTHING CRIMINAL – IT IS A SIGNATURE THEME HE DEMONSTRATES AND HE CONTINUALLY CONFIRMS PREMEDITATION IRREFUTABLY]

Police offered the defendant’s silence and behavioral change as incriminating evidence. The court held that police did not violate the defendant’s rights against self-incrimination, in part because the defendant did not expressly invoke his Fifth Amendment rights.

The California Supreme Court reached a similar conclusion in a recent decision, People v. Tom, No. S202107 (Cal., Aug. 14, 2014), which involved evidence of literal silence after an alleged drunk-driving accident—specifically, that the defendant “expressed no concern about the well-being of the other people involved in the collision.” Since this lack of concern occurred after the defendant’s arrest but before he received Miranda warnings, and because he did not expressly assert his right to silence, the court held that his rights were not violated.

Relevance to the Psychiatric Fraud

I read an interesting article today by Chandra Tilake Edirisuriya dated 19 May 2017 and published in Ceylon Today.

 

Following on from other articles in the CHIS series:-

LAW OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

In the case of Chettiar v Darley Butler & Company (1932) 34 NLR 41, two connected proceedings were brought up in revision. In the first case, a person who had not yet instituted criminal proceedings against another on a contemplated charge of cheating...

I specifically refer to the following sections, and have made some small highlighting and editing changes:-

In the case of Chettiar v Darley Butler & Company (1932) 34 NLR 41, two connected proceedings were brought up in revision. In the first case, a person who had not yet instituted criminal proceedings against another on a contemplated charge of cheating had obtained a search warrant in respect of certain bags of rice which were alleged to have formed the subject-matter of the offence. In quashing the Magistrate’s order for the issue of a search warrant, Akbar J was content to say that the material placed before the Magistrate was insufficient to justify the issue of a search warrant.

[SADLY I GET ACCUSED OF THIS ALL THE TIME!]

“In the connected case, the respondent had charged the petitioner with criminal breach of trust in respect of some bags of rice (allegedly the property of the respondent) which he had entrusted to the petitioner as a bailee. The Magistrate allowed the respondent’s application for a general search warrant for the discovery of the rice. Akbar J agreed that a Magistrate had very wide powers to issue a search warrant for the purpose of the investigation of an offence which had been disclosed by legal evidence on record, but commented adversely on the fact that the warrant had been obtained in this case on hearsay evidence.”

[EDS AND PDS CONTINUALLY DEMONSTRATE CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST AND THEIR CONTINUAL PERVERSION OF THE COURSE OF JUSTICE IS LAUGHABLE – IN FACT THEIR DESIRE TO ‘TICK ALL THE BOXES’ MEANS THAT THEIR PERVERSION CAN BE USED AS MY OWN EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE.]

“It was decided in the case of Police Sergeant, Tangalle v Porthenis (1920) 22 NLR 163 that the principle deducible from the decision in Chettiar’s case is that the power of a Court to issue a search warrant for the investigation of an offence can be exercised only when the offence has been disclosed prima facie by evidence which had been properly admitted.”

“The definition of situations in Sub-sections (a) and (b) of Section 68 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Act No 15 of 1979, in which a Court is empowered to issue a search warrant, includes references to “a document or other thing”.

“It has been held in the cases of de Soysa v Karagan (1892) 1 SCR 101 and Jonklaas v Silva (1892) 1 SCR 199 that the word “thing”, in the two relevant Sub-sections, has a wide meaning. It is not to be construed as referring to a thing eiusdem generis with the word “document” as used in the same context. The word “thing”, then encompasses all categories of real evidence such as physical objects, articles and specimens.”

[LAWFULLY AND UNLAWFULLY-OBTAINED WARRANTLESS SURVEILLANCE, AS WELL AS CALL RECORDINGS AND WOULD FALL INTO THIS CATEGORY BUT THEY NEED TO BE GENUINE AND PROPERLY ADMITTED – AN EASY ONE TO CHALLENGE.]

“Situation (c) in which a search warrant may be issued by a Court appears to be of very extensive scope, but the area of its applicability had been curtailed by judicial interpretation. An important consideration in this regard is that the power conferred by this provision cannot be availed of to the detriment of an accused person,” says Professor G.L. Peiris in his landmark thesis ‘Criminal Procedure in Sri Lanka’.”

“The phrase “an accused person” is used here “in the sense in which these words describe a person against whom criminal proceedings have actually been instituted and are pending in a Court of criminal judicature” as Gratiaen J said in the case of de Mel v Haniffa (1952) 53 NLR 433 at page 438,” adds Prof. Peiris.”

Criminal Breach of Trust

“In Re Abdul Latiff (1917) 19 NLR 346, the complainant had instituted proceedings against his partner for criminal breach of trust in respect of certain partnership assets. Pending the inquiry, he obtained a search warrant to secure the production and inspection of all books of the partnership business. Wood Renton J held (with Sampayo J concurring) that, under Sub-section (c) of the relevant provision, the Magistrate had full power to order a general search for, and inspection of, all books of the partnership if he considered the adoption of that course necessary for the purpose of proceedings. However, the Court expressly refrained from deciding whether exception could successfully be taken on behalf of the accused at the trial to the admission in evidence against him of the books covered by the search warrant.”

Power to Restrict a Warrant

“On the power to restrict a warrant Section 69 lays down that the Court may if it thinks fit specify in the warrant the particular place or part thereof to which only the search or inspection shall extend, and the person charged with the execution of such warrant shall then search or inspect only the place or part so specified.”

“On the requirement that an officer should make a list of the things seized, Section 75 lays down that the person executing the search warrant shall make a list of all things seized in the course of the search and of the places in which they are respectively found and shall sign such list.”

[NO-ONE HAS PROVIDED ME WITH A LIST OF ITEMS SEIZED AND NO EVIDENCE OF WHERE AND HOW THEY ARE ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED AT MY PROPERTY.]

I refer to this article:-

 

Evidence of Parallel Construction

20180118 UPDATES I have cross-referenced a few articles which will make my ‘adventures’ easier to comprehend 🙂 20170324 INITIAL

“On the provision that the occupant of the place search may attend, Section 76 lays down that the occupant of the place searched or some person on his behalf shall in every instance be permitted to attend during the search and a copy of the list prepared under Section 75, signed by the person executing the warrant, shall be delivered to such occupant or person.”

[THE PSYCHIATRIC FRAUD RUN BY EDS ENSURED THAT I WAS NOT ABLE TO ATTEND, AND AS STATED IN THE PARAGRAPH ABOVE NO LIST WAS DELIVERED TO ME. MORE IMPORTANTLY I KNEW THAT IT WAS GOING TO TAKE PLACE FROM MY CALLS WITH SILVA AND ACCORDINGLY I WAS PREPARED TO CHALLENGE IT MYSELF WITH INTERLOCUTORIES.

 

Monaco

Early Identification of Issues From around August 2015 I identified increased covert surveillance and electronic disruption. Actually I first realised...

EDS FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED MY LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP AND PREVENTED ME PARTICIPATING IN MY OWN DEFENCE AND THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL!

MANY OF MY OTHER LINKEDIN ARTICLES REFER TO ANTON PILLER-TYPE ORDERS.]

Serious Fraudster Office

I read some very interesting articles today about the Serious Fraud Office. I note that there are so many signature themes presented by Vincent

“On the powers of a Magistrate when he is present at a search, Section 79 lays down that (1) the Magistrate by whom a search warrant is issued may attend personally for the purpose of seeing that the warrant is duly executed and (2) that any Magistrate may orally direct a search to be made in his presence, of any place for the search of which he is competent to issue a search warrant.”

Questions So Far

Acquisition of evidence lawfully would have required a Magistrates Court order at the very least The question is ‘was one obtained or not’?

If an order was obtained, then the Psychiatric Fraud prevented me from challenging it, prevented me from instructing my own attorneys, and even obtaining independent attorneys to oversee the process.

I would have followed established Anton Piller protocols OBVIOUSLY and any court order would then have been administered properly, and fair to both parties.

If there was No Court Order:-

No Court Order

Apparently I 'incorporate what I see around me into my system':- 20141213 100730 More BULLSHIT from Edward de Saram ("EDS") and once again completely...

which has been a feature of this Psychiatric Free-for-all then it confirms

YET ANOTHER VIOLATION OF MY HUMAN RIGHTS

Natural Justice has been irreparably compromised and this is a:-

A MASSIVE PERVERSION OF THE COURSE OF JUSTICE

Obviously my defence materials have been stolen and 10 terabytes is a lot of material, and it is handy that I have this forensic evidence which confirms that I am completely correct in my assertions:-

Destruction of Evidence and Perversion of the Course of Justice

20171006 UPDATE - FORENSIC EVIDENCE CONFIRMING THIRD PARTIES Notwithstanding the FACT that parties had OBVIOUSLY entered my house, and had stolen

And it is more handy that I have managed to cleverly recover evidence with nails the perpetratorsI need a lot more time to attempt to recover more data but things are looking extremely promising – it has taken me nearly two years to get to this point…

Of particular interest is the forensic evidence that confirms the deliberate destruction of my data by the investigators and their agents themselves – that is another massive problem for them!!

This VERY INTERESTING CASE continues…

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP