The Shocking State of Psychiatry in Sri Lanka

By | POLITICAL PSYCHIATRY

The Shocking State of Psychiatry in Sri Lanka

Published on 1st October 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
520

Enter more text here

Angoda Psychiatric Facility aka National Institute of Mental Health

‘Angoda’ was the location where I was going to be transferred to for the [fraudulent] Electroconvulsive Therapy, that had been planned by Edward de Saram, Newton Ranasinghe and their cross-border associates.

Before I go into detail, I would like to present information on the psychiatric situation in Sri Lanka. 

Deteriorating conditions in Sri Lankan psychiatric hospitals

Under conditions in which the incidence of psychiatric disorders is on the rise in Sri Lanka, there has been a marked deterioration in the state of the country’s major mental institutions. Declining government health funding has resulted in understaffing, poor accommodation and a lack of necessary drugs and equipment.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus eu purus id massa luctus tempor. Etiam sed ex justo. Nulla maximus enim vitae vulputate ullamcorper. Quisque vehicula vitae turpis vitae sodales. Morbi fermentum nibh elit, a vehicula purus aliquet eu. Donec iaculis neque a dolor ultricies tincidunt. In volutpat augue erat, in maximus lorem pharetra auctor. Cras tempor scelerisque placerat. Cras vitae erat ex. Suspendisse tincidunt diam vitae nisl fringilla aliquam. Etiam vel tempor ipsum.

Sri Lanka struggles with mental health burden

Nearly a year after the brutal civil war in Sri Lanka was declared over by the government, Nayanah Siva reports on the mental health problems facing the conflict-scarred population.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus eu purus id massa luctus tempor. Etiam sed ex justo. Nulla maximus enim vitae vulputate ullamcorper. Quisque vehicula vitae turpis vitae sodales. Morbi fermentum nibh elit, a vehicula purus aliquet eu. Donec iaculis neque a dolor ultricies tincidunt. In volutpat augue erat, in maximus lorem pharetra auctor. Cras tempor scelerisque placerat. Cras vitae erat ex. Suspendisse tincidunt diam vitae nisl fringilla aliquam. Etiam vel tempor ipsum.

From hell to heaven

Reminiscent of regalia of the British Empire, a tall elegant building stands in a strangely spacious land in the suburb of Colombo, Angoda. The building was constructed by the British as far back as 1929 albeit it still stands tall amidst host of other buildings that make up the Angoda Mental (Teaching) Hospital...

which RECO

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

Criminals Who Wear Badges

By | MISCELLANEOUS
Criminals-Who-Wear-Badges

Criminals Who Wear Badges ±

Published on 4th August 2018
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
290

Enter more text here

Enter more text here

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

Universal Jurisdiction in Torture via Section 134 UK Criminal Justice Act 1988 √

By | KEY ARTICLES
fight-in-justice-joseph-de-saram

Universal Jurisdiction in Torture via Section 134 UK Criminal Justice Act 1988

First Published (LinkedIn) on 28th December 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
732

Enter more text here

20160802 122227 Joseph de Saram Serious Injuries from Torture

“THE POLICE BEAT ME UP”

I am in the process of writing a number of articles in relation to ‘Evidence of Military Intelligence Operation was Destroyed via Psychiatric Fraud’ and this article Universal Jurisdiction in Torture via Section 134 UK Criminal Justice Act 1988 is one that I will be referring to. I will insert initial evidence into this article however.

Human Rights Watch

The prohibition against torture is a bedrock principle of international law.

Torture, as well as cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, is banned at all times, in all places, including in times of war. No national emergency, however dire, ever justifies its use. No one may ever be returned to a place where they would face torture. Many countries and armed groups nonetheless have engaged in torture.

Human Rights Watch documents the use of torture all over the world. We are committed to pressing government authorities to act to prevent torture, as well as bringing those who engage in torture to justice. We also work to ensure that victims of torture obtain redress, including an enforceable right to fair and adequate compensation, and full rehabilitation.

The UK Criminal Justice Act 1988:-

Criminal Justice Act 1988

An Act to make fresh provision for extradition; to amend the rules of evidence in criminal proceedings; to provide for the reference by the Attorney General of certain questions relating to sentencing to the Court of Appeal; to amend the law with...

and note the fairly broad drafting of its terms.

The following paragraphs are reproduced in their entirety and I have added my comments in square parentheses.

Legislation

(1) A public official or person acting in an official capacity, whatever his nationality, commits the offence of torture if in the United Kingdom or elsewhere he intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another in the performance or purported performance of his official duties.

INTENTIONAL INFLICTION, SEVERE PAIN, PURPORTED PERFORMANCE, OFFICIAL DUTIES

Evidence of Official Capacity and Duties – Cellular Interception

Irrefutable Identification of Cellular Interception via Pure Forensic Analysis

The video above is by Annie Machon, an ex-Intelligence Officer who worked for MI5. Annie is one of the few of us left who actually have Brains &...
irrefutable-identification-of-cellular-interception-via-pure-forensic-analysis-joseph-de-saram-rhodium-linkedin-featured

Evidence of Official Capacity and Duties – Electronic Surveillance

Government Health Warning

Pure Forensics One of the 'purely forensic' features of the 12/17 Fraud was the covert electronic surveillance and cellular jamming. The evidence is...

Evidence of Official Capacity and Duties – Covert Human Intelligence Sources

Covert Human Intelligence Sources - CHIS

Still writing this - check back please Covert Human Intelligence Sources ("CHIS") The utilisation of CHIS against me in 2015 onwards was a nothing...

(2) A person not falling within subsection (1) above commits the offence of torture, whatever his nationality, if—

(a) in the United Kingdom or elsewhere he intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another at the instigation or with the consent or acquiescence

(i) of a public official; or

(ii) of a person acting in an official capacity; and

[ACQUIESCENCE – MEANING ‘RELUCTANT CONSENT’ OR ‘WITHOUT PROTEST’]

(b) the official or other person is performing or purporting to perform his official duties when he instigates the commission of the offence or consents to or acquiesces in it.

(3) It is immaterial whether the pain or suffering is physical or mental and whether it is caused by an act or an omission.

20151022 – STAGED Road Traffic Accident

RHO-hypnol as a Data Rape Drug

"Data Rape is the process by which any type of Intellectual Property is exfiltrated by the temporary or otherwise incapacitation of its Guardian." -...

20151022 – Evidence of Grievous Bodily Harm

A Real Pain in the Neck

The Staged Road Traffic Accident on 22 October 2015 resulted in significant damage to my cervical vertebrae and/or intervertebral discs causing some...

20151026_213632 JDSLK Asiri Surgical Hospital MRI Lateral Deviation of Cervical Spine DSCN2851

20151026_000000 JDSLK Asiri Surgical Hospital MRI Dislocations Im4 C4-C5-C6 DSCN2864

20151217 – Aggravated Kidnap and Unlawful Imprisonment

Per Legem Terrae - Perversion of the Course of Justice via Political Psychiatry

20171026 UPDATE Under a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty request, it is IMPERATIVE that ALL ACTIONS performed in the target country FULLY COMPLIES with...

20151217 – Evidence of Grievous Bodily Harm

20151026_000000 JDSGB Evidence of Cervical Spine Injuries 01

20151026_213632 JDSLK Asiri Surgical Hospital MRI Lateral Deviation of Cervical Spine

20151026_000000 JDSGB Evidence of Cervical Spine Injuries 02

20151026_000000 JDSLK Asiri Surgical Hospital MRI Im1-Im8 A

20151218_000000 Evidence of Facial Injuries after Torture

20151218_054228_01 Serious Facial Injuries After Torture b850b9ebb2_00975_annotated

20151220_000000 Evidence of Facial Injuries after Torture

20151220_084548_02 Serious Facial Injuries After Torture 7bdf68eec3_02888_annotated

20151218_000000 Evidence of Finger Hand and Wrist Injuries After Torture

20151218_054228_01 Serious Finger Hand Injuries After Torture b850b9ebb2_00975_annotated

20151220_000000 Evidence of Finger Hand and Wrist Injuries After Torture

20151220_084548_02 Serious Finger Hand Injuries After Torture 7bdf68eec3_03175_annotated

(4) It shall be a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section in respect of any conduct of his to prove that he had lawful authority, justification or excuse for that conduct.

[NO PROOF IS [ABLE TO BE] FORTHCOMING BECAUSE THE PERPETRATORS NEVER HAD ANY.]

[NO-ONE ACTED UNDER ANY LAW, NO-ONE ACTED UNDER ANY LAWFUL AUTHORITY, NO-ONE HAD ANY JUSTIFICATION AND NO-ONE HAD ANY EXCUSE UNDER ANY LAW.]

(5) For the purposes of this section “lawful authority, justification or excuse” means—

(a) in relation to pain or suffering inflicted in the United Kingdom, lawful authority, justification or excuse under the law of the part of the United Kingdom where it was inflicted;

(4) It shall be a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section in respect of any conduct of his to prove that he had lawful authority, justification or excuse for that conduct.

[NO PROOF IS [ABLE TO BE] FORTHCOMING BECAUSE THE PERPETRATORS NEVER HAD ANY.]

[NO-ONE ACTED UNDER ANY LAW, NO-ONE ACTED UNDER ANY LAWFUL AUTHORITY, NO-ONE HAD ANY JUSTIFICATION AND NO-ONE HAD ANY EXCUSE UNDER ANY LAW.]

(5) For the purposes of this section “lawful authority, justification or excuse” means—

(a) in relation to pain or suffering inflicted in the United Kingdom, lawful authority, justification or excuse under the law of the part of the United Kingdom where it was inflicted;

[NO-ONE ACTED UNDER ANY LAW, NO-ONE ACTED UNDER ANY LAWFUL AUTHORITY, NO-ONE HAD ANY JUSTIFICATION AND NO-ONE HAD ANY EXCUSE UNDER ANY LAW.]

(b) in relation to pain or suffering inflicted outside the United Kingdom

(i) if it was inflicted by a United Kingdom official acting under the law of the United Kingdom or by a person acting in an official capacity under that law, lawful authority, justification or excuse under that law;

[NO-ONE ACTED UNDER ANY LAW, NO-ONE ACTED UNDER ANY LAWFUL AUTHORITY, NO-ONE HAD ANY JUSTIFICATION AND NO-ONE HAD ANY EXCUSE UNDER ANY LAW.]

(ii) if it was inflicted by a United Kingdom official acting under the law of any part of the United Kingdom or by a person acting in an official capacity under such law, lawful authority, justification or excuse under the law of the part of the United Kingdom under whose law he was acting; and

[NO-ONE ACTED UNDER ANY LAW, NO-ONE ACTED UNDER ANY LAWFUL AUTHORITY, NO-ONE HAD ANY JUSTIFICATION AND NO-ONE HAD ANY EXCUSE UNDER ANY LAW.]

(iii) in any other case, lawful authority, justification or excuse under the law of the place where it was inflicted.

[NO-ONE ACTED UNDER ANY LAW, NO-ONE ACTED UNDER ANY LAWFUL AUTHORITY, NO-ONE HAD ANY JUSTIFICATION AND NO-ONE HAD ANY EXCUSE UNDER ANY LAW.]

Psychiatric Fraud - Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Part 1

Ignorantia juris non excusat or ignorantia legis neminem excusat (Latin for "ignorance of the law excuses not" and "ignorance of law excuses no one"...

(6) A person who commits the offence of torture shall be liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for life.

Third Party Articles

I refer to an excellent article written by Charlotte Wright of Kingsley Napley

Legal update: Universal Jurisdiction - Which foreign crimes can be tried in the UK? | Criminal Law Blog | Kingsley Napley

An internationally recognised law firm based in central London...

Previously we have described how, by the application of the principle of universal jurisdiction, certain offences, which can be broadly categorised as “war crimes”, can be prosecuted in the UK regardless of where they were committed and whether there is any nexus to the UK.

The offences falling into this category and which might be prosecuted in the UK are largely covered by three acts:

  • Geneva Conventions Act 1957
  •  Criminal Justice Act 1988
  • International Criminal Court Act 2001

Criminal Justice Act 1988 (“CJA”)

Section 134 of the CJA provides for the offence of torture as follows:

(1) A public official or person acting in an official capacity, whatever his nationality, commits the offence of torture if in the United Kingdom or elsewhere he intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another in the performance or purported performance of his official duties

Subsection (2) provides for an offence where a person “intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another at the instigation or with the consent or acquiescence” of a public official.

The offence can be committed “in the United Kingdom or elsewhere”, and “whatever [the accused’s] nationality”. As such it is an offence of universal jurisdiction.

The offence is triable only on indictment, and the maximum sentence is life imprisonment (CJA s134(6)). The Attorney General’s consent is required to prosecute (CJA s135).

as well as Justice UK:-

Torture in UK law - Justice

The most comprehensive account yet assembled of the human rights abuses associated with CIA secret detention and extraordinary rendition operations....

Torture is illegal, right?

Yes. The use of torture has been contrary to common law for several centuries, and the UK was well ahead of many other European jurisdictions in abolishing its use. Although the common law prohibited torture, however, the Privy Council continued to issue torture warrants until Felton’s case in 1628 and it was not until the Long Parliament in 1640 that the practice was formally abolished. In Scotland, torture was prohibited by section 5 Treason Act 1708.

In addition to the established common law provisions, section 134 Criminal Justice Act 1988 makes it an offence for any public official to ‘intentionally inflict severe pain or suffering on another in the perfomance … of his official duties’. This provision was introduced to honour the UK’s commitments under the 1984 UN Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (the Torture Convention).

Under international law, torture is not only prohibited under such instruments as Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the Torture Convention, but it has become recognised as ius cogens, a preemptory norm of international law that binds all states whether they have signed instruments such as the Torture Convention or not.((See eg Prosecutor v Furundzija [1998] ICTY 3, 10 December 1998, paragraphs 147-157)) The prohibition against torture under Article 3 ECHR is also one of the few rights that cannot be derogated from in a state of emergency under Article 15.

Torture is something that only happens in other countries. Why is it a human rights issue in the UK?

For several reasons.

First, the various international instruments prohibiting torture not only make it unlawful for UK officials to commit torture but also forbid, for example, the UK sending people to countries where they face a real risk of torture. Although the government maintains that it would never return someone to a country where they face a risk of torture, the Human Rights Act 1998 is regularly relied upon in extradition and deportation cases to challenge the government’s assessment of whether a risk of ill-treatment exists. Even more controversial is the UK government’s negotiation of Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) with countries such as Jordan and Libya, in order to deport suspects to countries where torture is known to be used. JUSTICE and Human Rights Watch are jointly intervening in the case of Secretary of State for the Home Department v OO in the House of Lords at the end of October to argue that MoUs cannot safely be relied upon.

Secondly, UK cooperation with other countries in the field of counter-terrorism and the UK involvement with the ‘War on Terror’ has raised serious questions about whether decisions about deportations and control orders have been based partly on evidence gathered under torture in other countries, including the ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’ used by US officials at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere.((See eg Jeremy Waldron, Torture and Positive Law: Jurisprudence for the White House 105 Columbia Law Review 1681-1750 October, 2005; Phillipe Sands, Torture Team, Penguin, 2008)) This was the key issue in the famous ‘Torture Evidence’ case (A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2)) in 2005.(([2005] UKHL 71)) In some cases, there have even been claims that UK officials were present during interrogations in other countries in which torture was used, most recently in the Binyam Mohammed case in the High Court in August.(([2008] EWHC 2048 (Admin)))

Thirdly, the conduct of the UK forces themselves, in particular the treatment of prisoners and the death of Baha Mousa, has highlighted defects in the guidance given to British soldiers concerning the proper treatment of detainees. Particularly striking is the apparent failure of the army to draw soldiers’ attention to the 1972 army directive prohibiting the ‘five techniques’ that were held by the European Court of Human Rights to breach Article 3 in Ireland v UK.(((1978) 2 EHRR 25))

Fourthly, there is an issue about the jurisdiction of British courts to punish torturers and provide redress to victims. Although the Pinochet case in 1999 established that foreign heads of state could not claim immunity from prosecution, and the 2005 prosecution of an Afghan warlord in the Old Bailey showed the ability to exercise universal jurisdiction for torture in criminal cases, the doctrine of state immunity in civil cases has still prevented many victims of torture from suing foreign governments in British courts to obtain redress against their torturers. ((Ron Jones v Saudi Arabia [2006] UKHL 26)) A private members bill is currently before Parliament to create an exception to allow such civil actions to proceed.

Fifthly, the scope of Article 3 ECHR extends more broadly than torture of detainees. Although torture is clearly outlawed in the UK, the concept of inhuman and degrading treatment has clear relevance to how detainees are treated in prisons, asylum detention centres, mental health facilities and youth detention centres. For example, the High Court recently warned that guidance on the use of ‘pain compliance techniques’ used on young people in secure training centres may be contrary to Article 3 ECHR.((C (A Minor) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWHC 171 (Admin)))

What’s the difference between torture and inhuman and degrading treatment?

The difference lies in the severity of the ill-treatment. Electrocuting a detainee, for instance, is plainly and obviously torture. By contrast, preventing a detainee from sleeping by use of bright lights and loud noises might not be sufficiently severe to qualify as torture, but it would likely qualify as inhuman treatment. In both cases, torture can be physical or non-physical (eg staging the execution of a family member).

The exact threshold is relative but in both cases, the ill-treatment must go beyond the ‘inevitable element of suffering or humiliation connected with a given form of legitimate treatment or punishment’.((Labita v Italy (ECtHR, 6 April 2000), paragraph 120)) The European Court of Human Rights has also made clear that the distinction ‘depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical or mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim’.((Selmouni v France (1999) 29 EHRR 403, paragraph 100))

Note also that the inhuman or degrading treatment need not be intentional, i.e. the state need not intend to cause pain and suffering in order for the conduct to breach Article 3 ECHR((See eg Pretty v United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR 1)), eg the government’s failure to provide support to destitute asylum seekers under section 55 Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.((R (Limbuela) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2005) UKHL 56))

Why does it matter?

The Torture Convention prohibits both torture, on the one hand, and inhuman and degrading treatment, on the other. However, its provisions sometimes draw a distinction, so that the UK government has – for instance – sometimes argued that the bar against returning a suspect to a risk of ‘lesser’ kinds of ill-treatment is not as absolute as the bar against returning a suspect to torture.

Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights prohibits both torture and inhuman and degrading treatment equally, however. In Saadi v Italy, for instance, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights rejected the UK government’s argument that a lesser degree of protection applied where the suspect is a risk to national security, noting that ‘such an approach is not compatible with the absolute nature of the protection afforded by Article 3’. Since Article 3 is directly enforceable in UK courts under section 6 Human Rights Act, it is likely that the exact distinction is less relevant in UK law.

Where can I get more information?

UN Committee Against Torture

European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT)

Freedom from Torture

REDRESS

Human Rights Watch report on diplomatic assurances

War crimes in Sri Lanka: call for sanctions & application of universal jurisdiction

War crimes in Sri Lanka: call for sanctions & application of universal ... jurisdiction to investigate, charge and prosecute Sri Lankan war

UN Committee Against Torture

The Committee Against Torture (CAT) is the body of 10 independent experts that monitors implementation of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by its State parties. ...

European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT)

The CPT organises visits to places of detention, in order to assess how persons deprived of their liberty are treated. These places include prisons, juvenile detention centres, police stations, holding centres for immigration detainees, psychiatric hospitals, social care homes, etc ...

Freedom from Torture

Too little change: ongoing torture in security operations in Sri Lanka Ten years on from the end of Sri Lanka’s civil war, Freedom from Torture has documented evidence of torture of its Tamil citizens....

REDRESS

To seek justice for survivors of torture; to combat impunity for governments and individuals who perpetrate torture; and to develop and promote compliance with international standards....

Human Rights Watch report on diplomatic assurances

The most comprehensive account yet assembled of the human rights abuses associated with CIA secret detention and extraordinary rendition operations....
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

Sudden Cardiac Arrest caused by Psychological and Physical Torture

By | TORTURE
sudden-cardiac-arrest-caused-by-psychological-and-physical-torture-joseph-de-saram-rhodium-linkedin

Sudden Cardiac Arrest caused by Psychological and Physical Torture (±x)

Published on 24th September 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
284

Enter more text here

There is plenty of evidence to support that Intentionally-Inflicted Emotional Distress (“IIED”) can result in grievous bodily harm and even death…

In general, the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress involves some kind of conduct that is so terrible that it causes severe emotional trauma in the victim. In such cases, the victim can recover damages from the person causing the emotional distress.

Not all offensive conduct qualifies as intentional infliction of emotional distress, however. People in society must necessarily deal with a certain level of rude or offensive conduct. When the conduct rises to a truly reprehensible level, though, recovery for the resulting emotional trauma becomes available.

Elements

While some states’ specific rules for intentional infliction differ, the following elements are fairly common:

  • Extreme or outrageous conduct that
  • Intentionally or recklessly causes
  • Severe emotional distress (and possible also bodily harm)

If the situation satisfies all of the elements above, the person behaving in the extreme and outrageous manner is liable for both the severe emotional distress and the bodily harm that results from the stress (a miscarriage, for example).

In addition, parties may sometimes recover for emotional distress under circumstances where the extreme and outrageous conduct wasn’t even directed at them. Typically, this kind of claim involves extreme or outrageous conduct towards the claimant’s family member while in the claimant’s presence. This type of claim varies even more widely between the states than the basic intentional infliction tort, but here are some of the general elements of the injury:

  • Extreme and outrageous conduct
  • Directed at a third person that
  • Intentionally or recklessly causes
  • Severe emotional distress
  • To a member of the third person’s immediate family (whether or not bodily harm occurs), or
  • To any other person present if bodily harm occurs

Extreme and Outrageous Conduct

Clearly, one of the most important issues in any claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is defining what exactly constitutes extreme and outrageous conduct. Without extreme and outrageous conduct, the injured party can’t make a claim for intentional infliction even if the actor behaved with malice and/or harmful intent.

Extreme and outrageous conduct goes beyond merely the malicious, harmful or offensive. People must have a certain level of thick skin and possess the ability to weather ordinary rude or obnoxious behavior.

In order to rise to the level of extreme and outrageous, the conduct must exceed all possible bounds of decency. Normal insults or rudeness don’t normally qualify as extreme and outrageous conduct, although they can rise to that level if there is some kind of special relationship between the parties.

In addition, ordinary insults or actions can constitute extreme and outrageous behavior if the actor knows that the victim is particularly susceptible to emotional distress because of some physical or mental condition or abnormality. For example, if Adam knows that Barbara is intensely claustrophobic and intentionally locks her in a closet to scare her, she could possibly recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Exercising a legal right can never amount to intentional infliction of emotional distress, however even if the behavior does cause some severe emotional trauma. If a landlord properly initiates eviction proceedings against a sick and destitute widow who has not paid rent in a year, his actions won’t constitute intentional infliction of emotional distress even if the widow does in fact suffer an extreme emotional reaction. Since the landlord was only exercising his legal rights, his behavior is most likely privileged.

In the end, a jury makes the final decision on whether the conduct in question rises to the level of extreme and outrageous.

Intent/Recklessness

In addition to acting in an extreme an outrageous manner, the actor must act with intent or recklessness. In other words, the actor must intend to cause severe emotional distress or know that severe emotional distress is likely to occur. The actor can also become liable for intentional infliction if they behave with deliberate disregard to the high possibility that severe emotional distress will occur.

For example, if someone receives a text message from their significant other while at a friend’s house, becomes angry, and smashes the urn containing their friend’s mother’s ashes, the friend could possibly win an intentional infliction lawsuit under the theory of reckless disregard.

Severe Emotional Distress

Emotional distress can take many forms. Many unpleasant emotions qualify as emotional distress, including embarrassment, shame, fright and grief.

In order to satisfy the elements of an intentional infliction claim, however, the emotional distress in response to extreme and outrageous behavior must reach a “severe” level. The exact definition of severe emotional distress is vague, and plaintiffs must prove to a jury that the emotional distress they experienced reached a sufficient level of severity to justify an award for intentional infliction.

Some guidelines do exist to help determine whether an emotional disturbance constitutes severe emotional distress. When extreme and outrageous conduct causes suffering such that no reasonable person should have to endure it, a jury will likely hold that the experience reached the level of severe emotional distress.

The intensity and duration of the emotional distress also contribute to its severity. The longer the emotional disturbance continues, the more likely it is to constitute severe emotional distress.

A plaintiff must use evidence to demonstrate their emotional distress to a jury. For example, a plaintiff can use persistent anxiety and paranoia resulting from a Halloween prank gone bad to show that they suffered extreme emotional distress as a result of the conduct.

Sometimes the very nature of the conduct in question will suffice to demonstrate that the victim suffered severe emotional distress. If behavior is particularly disturbing, the plaintiff may not have to offer much evidence to support their claims; the behavior itself is so reprehensible that the emotional distress is almost assumed.

Bodily harm also acts as an indicator that severe emotional distress has occurred. Ulcers or headaches, for example, can show that the plaintiff has experienced severe emotional distress that has revealed itself through these physical symptoms.

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - FindLaw

In general, the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress involves some kind of conduct that is so terrible that it causes severe emotional trauma in the...

Medical Evidence

Patients with specific neurological, psychiatric or cardiovascular conditions are at enhanced risk of cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death. The neurogenic mechanisms are poorly understood.

However, in many cases, stress may precipitate cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death in vulnerable patients, presumably via centrally driven autonomic nervous system responses. From a cardiological perspective, the likelihood of arrhythmia is strongly associated with abnormalities in electrical repolarization (recovery) of the heart muscle after each contraction.

Inhomogeneous and asymmetric repolarization, reflected in ECG T-wave abnormalities, is associated with a greatly increased risk of arrhythmia, i.e. a proarrhythmic state. We therefore undertook a study to identify the brain mechanisms by which stress can induce cardiac arrhythmia through efferent autonomic drive.

We recruited a typical group of 10 out-patients attending a cardiological clinic. We simultaneously measured brain activity, using H215O PET, and the proarrhythmic state of the heart, using ECG, during mental and physical stress challenges and corresponding control conditions.

Proarrhythmic changes in the heart were quantified from two ECG-derived measures of repolarization inhomogeneity and were related to changes in magnitude and lateralization of regional brain activity reflected in regional cerebral blood flow. Across the patient group, we observed a robust positive relationship between right-lateralized asymmetry in midbrain activity and proarrhythmic abnormalities of cardiac repolarization (apparent in two independent ECG measures) during stress.

This association between stress-induced lateralization of midbrain activity and enhanced arrhythmic vulnerability provides empirical support for a putative mechanism for stress-induced sudden death, wherein lateralization of central autonomic drive during stress results in imbalanced activity in right and left cardiac sympathetic nerves.

A right–left asymmetry in sympathetic drive across the surface of the heart disrupts the electrophysiological homogeneity of ventricular repolarization, predisposing to arrhythmia. Our findings highlight a proximal brain basis for stress-induced cardiac arrhythmic vulnerability.

Mental stress and sudden cardiac death: asymmetric midbrain activity as a linking mechanism | Brain | Oxford Academic

Patients with specific neurological, psychiatric or cardiovascular conditions are at enhanced risk of cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death. The neurogenic mechanisms are poorly understood. However, in many cases, stress may precipitate cardiac ...
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

Honour Based Violence

By | KEY ARTICLES

Honour Based Violence (±x)

Published on 26th April 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
358

Enter more text here

“There was an unexpected distraction for Professor Robert Kelly when he was being interviewed live on BBC News about South Korea. But he managed to keep his composure and complete the interview successfully.”

When I originally saw this video last month I thought the behaviour of Prof Kelly’s nanny was a little ridiculous and uneducated in the way that she grabbed his two young children.

When I subsequently found out that the woman was his wife, I was initially shocked at the way she manhandled her own children in order to ‘keep up appearances’ but then remembered that ‘Asians living in Asia have a justification for doing the wrong thing’ and ‘have an inability to tell right from wrong’.

Asians in the UK are among the best attorneys and Asians in New York are among the best private bankers. And we all know how clever Asians are in Silicon Valley 🙂

It is the physical location that is responsible for this issues, and the GroupThink environment of course.

Watching the video at 22s, the right arm of the child is violently jerked and I am surprised that there was not an anterior dislocation or even subluxation at her shoulder joint. A torsion fracture is another common injury for children, and I sustained a few whilst playing rugby in the U11s at Barlborough Hall School.

At 31s she is being dragged along the ground by the same arm. Is this normal behaviour? I am from the UK and I find it quite sickening actually.

Western v Asian Culture

The difference between the two are highlighted in two parody videos:-

the first 30 seconds of:-

The UK woman correctly identifies that her child is connected on a cellular-genetic level and that there is a loving bond between the pair of them. She does not allow a third party or event (such as a tv interview) to get in the way of that bond.

The Indian man (any South Asian culture will do) irrationally feels that the action of his son has brought a ‘great’ shame on him (first error of judgement) and then proceeds to beat up the child publicly in order to lift his ‘perceived’ estimation in the eyes of the interviewer (second error of judgement).

Honour Based Violence

A report from 08 December 2015 found that the majority of UK Police were ‘not properly prepared’:-

However I see that my old local police force Derbyshire Constabulary ‘passed all stages of the review’ and were only one of three to do so.

Globalizing Torture: CIA Secret Detention and Extraordinary Rendition

The most comprehensive account yet assembled of the human rights abuses associated with CIA secret detention and extraordinary rendition operations....

http://www.derbyshire.police.uk/Safety-advice/Personal-Safety/Forced-Marriages-and-Honour-Abuse.asp

Of course it is a shame that Edward de Saram (“EDS”) was ignorant of the report and his fraud of 17 December 2015 really fooled no-one apart from him, his audience and HMRC/NCA.

Asian Culture

‘Forced Marriage’ is the typical crime that comes to mind and the public perception tends to be about a woman who has done the ‘wrong thing’. Even children ‘disobeying’ their parents is the most heinous of crimes and I learned this the hard way when EDS discovered a love-letter from Ruth Burke in May 1986 or being told that I was not at a ‘marriageable age’ when ‘going out’ with Lisa Herbert. In these situations the fact that I had a girlfriend (or 10) was a massive problem.

A lot of the issues arise from ineptitude and complete lack of exposure of South Asians to the real world. I have realised that this issue is prevalent in countries that have formerly been British Colonies. It would seem that in Days of Empire, the ones in charge and who had the money were the ones who were best dressed.

Local Asians who were ordered around therefore identified those superior to them by their appearance and for many of the illiterate ones this was the only way.

And when the Asians returned to their children, they would chastise them in a humiliating way (given the fact that the parents most probably would have felt humiliated by having foreigners tell them what to do). However this does not imply that the foreigners treated them poorly – it is the irrational perception of the Asians and their own self-victimisation by which they get ‘brownie’ points (literally).

Actually this feature of Asians being subservient is known as MacArthur Syndrome:-

An example of this is when Sri Lanka played Australia at cricket, say around 20yrs ago. Despite Sri Lanka being the better team, the players would let their ‘irrational fear of the perceived strength of the opposition’ prevent them playing to the best of their abilities. Sri Lanka would then lose and the result would give credence to their original flawed opinion.

Asian Parents

These self-destructive self-fulfilling prophecies are often found in cultures where parents feel they ‘own’ their children.

Asian parents believes that they own their children and that's why they are so controlling? • r/AsianParentStories

As such the way for such Asians to survive in an ‘irrationally illogical’ culture was to focus on being ‘superficial two-faced polished turds’. The other cultural issue is that Asians have poor self-discipline – even my Singapore lawyers were classless liars and it is all about ‘what can they get away with’ rather than ‘full compliance with the law’ or even professional ethics.

Crown Prosecution Service – Honour based violence

  1. There is no specific offence of “honour based crime”. It is an umbrella term to encompass various offences covered by existing legislation. Honour based violence (HBV) can be described as a collection of practices, which are used to control behaviour within families or other social groups to protect perceived cultural and religious beliefs and/or honour. Such violence can occur when perpetrators perceive that a relative has shamed the family and/or community by breaking their honour code.
  2. It is a violation of human rights and may be a form of domestic and/or sexual violence. There is no, and cannot be, honour or justification for abusing the human rights of others.
  3. The CPS, ACPO and support groups have a common definition of HBV:
“‘Honour based violence’ is a crime or incident which has or may have been committed to protect or defend the honour of the family and/or community.”

Human Rights

I have always been a Human Rights Activist though that was in relation to mass electronic surveillance:-

Article 12.

“No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.”

Article 19.

“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

After what happened on 17 December 2015:-

Asking these fools why I need to open the door yielded an answer ‘Money Disruption’ – what does that mean? Or is that the new term for ‘Money Laundering’ – given the involvement of HMRC I think it is MLAT-related 🙂

I realised that other Fundamental Human Rights should never be taken for granted.

The enhanced audio is at http://www.jsrds.rehab and it really does confirm the fraud.

HMRC is Inextricably Involved

Ray Callingham failed in his mission to get the HMRC forms signed which would have opened up my income and asset structures – so after Fake Probable Cause and Staged Crime Scenes were effected by EDS from December 2015 onwards I needed to be removed from the house to enable their fraud to progress with no oversight. It is SO obvious really.

Clearly parties had been informed that I was under some criminal investigation (for not going to church or not eating enough vegetables, or some other crap propagated by the Melbourne Fraudsters no doubt) and EDS equated an ‘investigation’ to a ‘conviction’ and was goaded on by, and acting in the capacity of an agent of HMRC/NCA.

So actually did HMRC beat me up ? It is entirely foreseeable that investigators turning up to Sri Lanka stirring up people with the promise of references from the Queen and a new life if they helped them ‘catch’ me would have directly led to fools here taking the law into their own hands and inflicting violence against me.

Crown Prosecution Service – Extra Territorial Jurisdiction

  1. Subss (7) and (8) make provision to take extra-territorial jurisdiction over both the coercion and deception elements of the new offence. Any of the prohibited acts in subss (1) and (2) carried out outside the UK by a UK national or person habitually resident in England or Wales, or to a UK national or person habitually resident in England or Wales, will be an offence under domestic law and triable in the courts of England and Wales. The effect of subs (5)(b) is that it will also be an offence under domestic law if the prohibited acts in subs (1) or (2) are conducted by or against a person habitually resident in England and Wales, but take place in Scotland or Northern Ireland.

Private Prosecution Time for EDS

Other examples of HBV

Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (“MSbP”)

As an additional issue which is prevalent among Asian Parents is MSbP.

to be continued…

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

Also in this series

The majority of police forces’ failure to tackle “honour”-based violence is punishing victims

Gaslighting and Data Exfiltration v10

By | Z MIGRATION IN PROGESS B

Gaslighting and Data Exfiltration v10 (±x)

Published on 18th December 2016
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
251

Enter more text here

20161222 UPDATE – WHEN THE COPS ARE THE ROBBERS – SAD AND FUNNY AT THE SAME TIME!

This photo was taken on 04 December 2015, during the time that Edward de Saram was playing his sad gaslighting games and telling me that there was no-one coming into the house, despite copious evidence to the contrary.

I have mentioned Staged Crime Scenes for [FAKE] Probable Cause and this is a good example of Investigator Clowns being over-zealous in their sick desires to frame me. As can be seen a crate has been staged, with the insertion of a Crown Removals folder, with various GST forms and various materials.

I do not arrange paperwork in this way, and any fool can see that the first group of clowns have gone in to plant / arrange items, and the second group would have been told to ‘look for the crown’.

This entire farce is Sad and Funny at the same time – unfortunately because of my knowledge of Law Enforcement protocols, I knew that Edward de Saram was facilitating quite a spectacular fraud from about 01 December 2015. It is so easy to demonstrate Criminal Intent because he has such a big mouth and in fact called people to tell them about his scheming!

And I love the way people have deleted this image off our systems, but I love the way I have recovered it, a lot more 🙂

20161221 UPDATE – EXAMPLE OF A NAUSEATING SRI LANKAN DOCTOR WHO IS PARTICIPATING IN THE CRIMINAL FRAUD OF EDWARD DE SARAM AND PRAXY DE SARAM

Dr (Mrs) Dulmini Jayasundara is one of the most irritating condescending baboons that I have ever met. As anyone can listen from these recordings there are significant errors in her medical knowledge which I was more than happy to point out.

According to her (which is completely wrong) drinking 3 litres of water per day causes hyponatraemia. How could I run legal cases or design schematics if I was feeling dizzy. This is just another fraud and she is alleging self-harm. Excuse me? My mind is incredibly alert when fools here are not trying to impress their foreign overlords, even with the heart issues! The UK/AU people are primarily responsible for this fraud.

All that has happened is Edward de Saram is looking at the symptoms of Schizophrenia and telling her that I have polydipsia – utter nonsense. I have low blood pressure, been brought up in the UK where the climate is cold, and I sweat a lot in Sri Lanka. When I sweat (computer environments are warm) I drink between 2 and 3 litres of water.

http://www.cosmopolitan.co.uk/beauty-hair/advice/a35197/drinking-water-skin-benefits/

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=3+litres+of+water+a+day

6 litres in the recognised figure for too much water – https://youtu.be/TvcbIXvWl_k

So apparently me drinking between 2 and 3 litres of water is self-harm is it? Is this really an amazing reason to Unlawfully Imprison me in Psychiatric Facility?

The whole Schizophrenia lie of Edward de Saram is described here:-

There was no point giving that baboon an explanation about Edward de Saram’s Criminal Fraud re psychotropic medication because in Sri Lanka the parents are always right, and whoever gets in first with their story is believed – that is a cognitive deficit known as Arbitrary Inference (“AI”). It seems that simple explanations are more factually correct that the actual factual explanation which is complex, and AI is where people form conclusions based on insufficient evidence.

And according to her simply because I do not like my parents who are a pair of Sad Abusive Fraudsters, that means I am paranoid.

Even when I specifically asked her on what basis she is making her assessment, she is unable to answer – apart from citing my ‘notes’ which of course Edward de Saram dictated. That is all he does, gets his lies in early and presents them in a plausible way. Classic Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

When I ask her to look at Forensic Evidence she is not interested – she simply repeats her flawed conclusions ad nauseum and I am actually astonished that I remained so calm!!

When I explained to her that I have evidentiary materials and a business to run she could not care less. The whole point of me staying in the hospital is so that people could go through my evidentiary materials and plant / discover /destroy items. I think this Perversion of the Course of Justice is obvious to any Western person, who is not involved in this Sri Lankan / Australian / Singapore / United Kingdom Fraud.

And as a final insult she is asking to take blood continually, and demanding I eat the food. What the f***? She is actually trying to irritate me so that she can prove a point, like many of the retards in Sri Lanka do? Unfortunately I know what PSYOPs are and I never react, unless I want to provide disinformation.

The food actually contained psychotropic medication which I discovered and spat out that very day! I am very sensitive to even Monosodium Glutamate at restaurants in fact – with 10mins I can tell – I get an unusual headache.

The whole plan was to give me Electroconvulsive Therapy – but whilst the fools congratulate each other on their lack of brilliance, it is the brilliant one who identifies them so early on. ‘Trying to convince a Fool that they are Wrong is much harder than convincing a Genius that they are Wrong’. – JSRDS. Perception is confused with Paranoia because the GroupThink decides it to be the case.

Here is another recording of Edward de Saram ‘leaking intent’ – both these fools think I am taking the medication that they have put into the food. Even the way Edward de Saram describes the conversation with me is another fabrication – as I have the recording and did not say most of the things he is alleging.

Even Dr Horadugoda confirmed that I should deal with my parents – so they ARE behind the Fraud. This retard dismisses everything I say just because the amounts are large. Calling me disorganised? Excuse me – my files were perfect before Edward de Saram’s facilitation of the destruction of my evidence.

Edward de Saram effectively states that he has no enquiry – that is yet another lie as everyone who works with him knows. I am a little sick and tired of either hearing that I have no insight , or making things up when I have evidence of Cellular Jammers and GPS Jammers and extremely complex items of evidence that demonstrate what is REALLY going on.

People here are not too dissimilar to Australians in their incredible amounts of expertise for everything under the sun and of course their flawed opinion / logical flaws when they are utterly clueless about Electronic Surveillance from Military and Law Enforcement personnel.

The bottom line is this – despite all this crap, I still managed to get out of the Psychiatric Facility without another doctor’s opinion so it proves that I was fine all along. And finding around 10 terabytes of materials missing including the Ray Callingham HMRC evidence, sums up the actual situation perfectly!

20161220 UPDATE – HOUSTON HE HAS A PROBLEM

Ray Callingham was pushed by Edward de Saram and Praxy de Saram as the person who should provide the book-keeping service in order to regularise our accounts. Additionally he was responsible for the incorporation of three new entities in the UK, that I and other entities could transfer assets to.

I knew from the first trip that he was asking in the capacity of an Agent of Law Enforcement (“LE”) but it did not bother me, as I thought he would actually do some work. I recall he was asking me about various lawyers and banks and it was clear even from then that he was merely asking for my support infrastructure, so that Investigators could make a nuisance of themselves.

Even before he came, him sending me an e-mail telling me where I lived confirmed is LE involvement – often parties get obsessed with documenting names of software, addresses, amounts, urls so that it is confirmed. Praxy de Saram was doing it all the time and it was really irritating.

One thing I noticed that Ray was really annoyed about was that he forgot to bring the HMRC Agent form on the first trip. He made such a fuss about it I wondered what the issue was because there were no sales in the UK or anticipated sales in the foreseeable future. We were in the process of obtaining asset inventories and missing paperwork.

Around November 2015 Ray and Kim Worrall were coming for a longer period, to scan the documentation and then work on them, since Joanne Cochrane and Kalasegaran Genkatharan (who are directors of Rhodium Australia Pty Ltd and Rhodium Singapore Pte Ltd had done f*** all during my heart issues). I was merely putting in money and following their instructions to my detriment – my loan accounts are massive in fact, and I am owed tonnes via my role as Financier!

As Ray did not want to come unless it was Business Class, and I politely declined since Praxy de Saram was paying for the tickets. I recall he was adamant about Business Class. However he suddenly changed his mind and he and Kim were scheduled.

From the moment he came on 28 November 2015, I noticed Electromagnetic Emanation from the pair of them, in particular I thought it was Kim. Kim looked at me intently whilst I was speaking without moving her head, and Ray looked down. This is classic surveillance, in which two people have a conversation but only one looks – they also sit in a non-parallel fashion which caused to me to rotate my head continually. It was painful because of the recent accident.

This is the part where I was talking about ‘Police Informant’ and work in which I ghostwrite Expert Testimony’ and I obviously recognised the surveillance so talked about crap, Iain’s Jones’ case with his bank statements (it reminded me of a project I did):-

and the lights flickered EXACTLY as I predicted when I used keywords. Ray and Kim responded by saying ‘Kim did you see, that, the light flickered’ or words to that effect – classic Police!

Ray then wanted me to sign the Tax form – he wanted me to simply sign it and write nothing else, and he seemed agitated when I wanted to fill even Beeley Hawley on it etc. He continually told me that he would complete the other sections. The conclusion that could be drawn was that he was not the ultimate user of the Authorisation, and it was going to be completed with different information and faxed to third parties in multiple jurisdictions – really not rocket science. If he was the ultimate user he would have already completed the information.

Data Recovery

A few days ago I recovered the Beeley Hawley Audio and Video recordings – another one of those great mysterious of life is how they too have been deleted during Edward de Saram’s clean-up operation.

These audio recordings confirm the [fraudulent] misrepresentations made by Ray ahead of the visits, the deliverables he promised but reneged on, and most importantly confirms lack of a genuine interest to regularise our accounts. A simple Private Prosecution to recover the monies arising from Ray’s fraud would be good 🙂

As the calls went on, it became more of him wanting certain items in a particular order, rather than him doing the work thoroughly and obtaining the items in any event, but merely not in his order…

And today I found the audio recordings of special interest, in which Ray asked me to sign the HMRC Authorisation on 29 November 2015, and I am in in the process of analysing these:-

https://soundcloud.com/user-93619079/20151129b-ray-callingham-instructing-not-to-date-hmrc-form/s-NCH1V

Ray’s instruction to me is “Don’t date it because if they lose it then I will need to submit another one later on” – excuse me? What utter bullshit! If Ray has to submit another one later on then it would need to be another original. Ray has to submit the original in order for it to be valid so how will not dating it make the slightest bit of difference. Why does Ray think HMRC will lose it, or is it going to be a template with my signature on for every Corporate Entity and Trust, the number yet to be determined!! Seems like the Gift that keeps on giving!

Not wishing me to date it would have given two options of either 28 November 2015 or 29 November 2015, if the audio evidence and discussions from the previous day were going to be used. Classic Police with an HMRC investigation thrown in 🙂

Ray had a bizarre interest in Taxation, Income and Payments, despite the fact that he is not qualified and/or licensed to give Taxation Advice for any of the jurisdictions in question. We had not even started the bookkeeping yet so how is taxation relevant? I had not earned for years so how was Income relevant? It was tiring though I was still polite (very unusual of me) after I cleverly identified his fraud 🙂

So I asked for the forms back, after Ray confirmed that they were effectively obsolete:-

And Ray was reluctant to, saying “Let me copy it as that will give me some information.” What information – the only thing is essentially my signature. Another bullshit excuse since it was he who typed the document and therefore he had his information already. I knew that that the form was going to be amended continually and faxed to third parties!

And of course the existence of a VAT Investigation against me in the late 1990s would allow my enemies to gather information and go on a fishing trip – Margaret Cunniffe is the liar at the heart of all this, obviously, and she does not know the actual position!

So after a while I simply told him that I knew what was going on. His guilty responses and how he subseqently slinked away was funny, but to truly appreciate you really have had to have been there 🙂

20161219 UPDATE – HOUSTON THEY HAVE A PROBLEM

The following screenshots were taken in 2014, and demonstrated various Criminal Offences by Margaret Cunniffe and David Brown. Mysteriously this evidence had been wiped from our systems, and the Samsung Galaxy S3 phone had become a brick during the events of December 2015. This S3 is Rhodium Equipment – the mere fact that the phone was ‘clean’ when provided to me (contacts deleted, sms deleted) and I have subsequently recovered incriminating evidence confirms the Consciousness of Guilt when they wiped it.

However, having recovered the original photos, we see two things:-

(a) they are Direct Evidence of the various Criminal Offences as well as Set-offs in civil cases against them;

(b) they are Circumstantial Evidence in the Destruction of Evidentiary Material / Fraud / Perversion of the Course of Justice cases against them and associated parties 🙂

Deleted Contacts, so we cannot liaise with them re Recovery of Assets

Abuse of Process by David Brown – asking Simon Thompson to put a Caveat on a property of AUD 650,000 despite them concurrently [fraudulently] obtaining Security of Costs for AUD 40,000

David Brown asking for the password for a Rhodium laptop in order to wipe it:-

David Brown instructing Margaret Cunniffe in relation to Criminal Conversion, and desposing of one of Joe’s/RHO’s Assets that they have stolen:-

David Brown instructing Margaret Cunniffe to Convert further Joe assets and place the proceeds into David Brown’s bank account:-

David Brown instructing Margaret Cunniffe to sell VIP Memberships:-

David Brown pleased that Margaret Cunniffe has Converted Joe’s assets into cash at the Pawnbroker:-

378 Chappel Street – http://www.chapelstreetpawnbrokers.com.au/

More Destruction of Evidence, this time in relation to an e-mail to Simon Thompson that was sent from the Premium IT account:-

Margaret Cunniffe demand that David Brown make VIP Club Membership sales

Clearly the Psychiatric Scam was absolutely nothing to do with Psychiatry – it was an elaborate fraud by Edward de Saram and Praxy de Saram to Pervert the Course of Justice, destroy all my legal cases (defences and counterclaims) and attempt to destroy Rhodium – how absolutely pathetic!

Margaret Cunniffe demand that David Brown make VIP Club Membership sales

Clearly the Psychiatric Scam was absolutely nothing to do with Psychiatry – it was an elaborate fraud by Edward de Saram and Praxy de Saram to Pervert the Course of Justice, destroy all my legal cases (defences and counterclaims) and attempt to destroy Rhodium – how absolutely pathetic!

Incapacitating the Victim by Psychological Fraud

I have previously mentioned, the entire Psychiatric Facility Scam fabricated by Edward de Saram, Praxy de Saram, and their co-conspirators was easily detectable and utterly ridiculous.

However, what has not been fully elucidated it what occurred at the early part of the fraud, as in how was I weakened to such an extent and why was the problem of my agitation so compounded towards the end.

This is where I would have normally relied on my evidence and video footage that I had actually made during Ray Callingham’s visit and the ridiculous visit of Edward de Saram. Nothing confirms the state of mind better than video and audio evidence made at the time.

As usual and of course blissfully conveniently, terabytes of data had been wiped, and these were files that were specifically required by me in my defence. To demonstrate that another party, Edward de Saram was responsible for causing psychological harm can be demonstrated by his continually lies and manipulative techniques, and the following video is one of MANY items of evidence I now have.

It is self-explanatory – as usual I do not try to spell everything out – I am used to working with the elite and I will save the hand-holding for the court case..

As can be seen I have detailed recall, and identify the ‘Fake Probable Cause’ issue that this entire case has been tainted with by the investigators – either rooms are ‘secret’ or that there are ‘ssds and hard drives’ etc. Chamaree Silva’s garbage is merely the Construct of Lawyers and it fools no-one except the co-conspirators. Here is another fraud of hers, this time involving SIM cards. This is yet another video that I have recovered!

Earlier that day 04 December 2015, I had specifically told Edward de Saram that there was no reason to wash the sheets – the reason is because I was having an adult sexual relationship with Chamaree Silva and the existence of the same confirms that I am not a Paedophile. There was Forensic Evidence on the sheets obviously and I wanted to cut the sheet and bag it!

Immediately Edward de Saram started the lies about how a conversation the previous day meant that he could wash them today (04 December 2015). He cannot grasp that there was a conversation ‘this morning’ in which I had specifically told him not to, citing the reasons.

Of course he cannot grasp/does not care that him turning up to my house, pulling things and telling me what to do will irritate me no end – he has no idea of boundaries sadly and both parents suffer from Narcissistic Personality Disorder…

I even told him that the sheets were ‘blue and now they are red’. Edward de Saram despite wanting to appear self-assured asked KSA Perera, (whom the former has paid around LKR 1.3 million to for no reason). Clearly KSA Perera would agree with anyone who gave him money, like many classless Sri Lankans.

Surely if Edward de Saram was so sure why is he even asking the question? As can be heard I am precise and recalling entire segments in detail, of that which has actually occurred. Edward de Saram became confident ONLY AFTER his minion/sycophant agreed with him. I was outnumbered so was restricted in that which I could do, especially I had a serious neck injury at the time and little upper body strength.

When I said ‘I took photos’ the response Edward de Saram gave is ‘you might have taken… but the photos are wrong, because I am absolutely sure… you have got it wrong’. He continued ‘there was no sheet there… for you to sleep we put the new sheet…’

Edward de Saram’s conclusion is then ‘so your camera is lying’. his technique is to respond simply and aggressively to my statements – as soon as I refer to a camera, it is the camera that is accused of lying!

How can someone make such outrageous statements?

Clearly I was so stunned that it actually prevented me from responding – this is the power of Gaslighting.

The fraud he and KSA Perera was running was that pieces of Poisoned Dry Fish were being left around the house at night. The only parties who were in the house was KSA Perera and Edward de Saram ergo they have facilitated it.

Edward de Saram has a history of attempting to kill the pets of Tania and I, as the two recordings demonstrate. The plan was to kill Shihara and cause me psychological harm – it failed miserably because I identified PSYOPs 🙂

https://soundcloud.com/user-93619079/20160802-126959-edward-de-saram-and-cat-killing-part-1/s-nnEzF

https://soundcloud.com/user-93619079/20160802-126959-edward-de-saram-and-cat-killing-part-2/s-xjcmh

Note how Edward de Saram feigns concern into ascertaining how the Dry Fish arrived initially? It was in fact poisoned because I sampled some of it and it gave me a massive headache and caused vomiting afterwards. I have a much larger mass than Shihara!

Discussions with Liars

Edward de Saram is not convincing as a parent who actually cares, moreover he is merely going through the motions which mean nothing in reality. The conversation ends which him stating that he only wants to look into something of his choosing so despite him feigning concern, he has no interest because he knows that he and KSA Perera are responsible. I could see their guilty expressions, and the fact that Edward de Saram lowers his voice when scheming is a classic…

More Evidence of ‘Destruction of Evidence’

To demonstrate that electrical devices had been modified and connected, as well as cables switched and various frauds were occurring, I took copious amounts of photos. Unfortunately they had all been destroyed. Thankfully I have just recovered them 🙂

The sheets were clearly blue and there were clearly body fluids on the sheet – this is yet another example of Destruction of Evidence, packaged as something else by Edward de Saram. He came to Sri Lanka to give Margaret Cunniffe and everyone under the sun some type of defence, though nicely confirmed the nature of the cabal as the parties he defends are the parties who are involved 🙂

Other Evidence Recovered on 17 December 2016

Ray Callingham’s HMRC form, the original which I have which necessitated the Fake Probable Cause:-

Note the photocopy and the original. Note how the photocopy is typed correctly, but the original (which is the one required by HMRC) is not. This was no mistake, Ray is a Fellow of the CAEW, and additionally other recordings with Ray confirm he knew that the original HMRC form was required…

Ray was not happy when I filled in Beeley Hawley & Co myself – he wanted me to leave it blank but signed in full. That in itself demonstrates he was acting as an agent of a third party and not acting in his own capacity.

By way of information, had I allowed Ray to take the form with him, parties would have opened up all Corporate Entities, Trust Structures and essentially anything that I was associated with.

However Ray and the Investigators and/or Police are nothing short of fools, and they need to reappraise their strategy against someone with vastly superior intellect, combined with defence and law enforcement experience!

Most importantly they need to stop Perverting the Course of Justice to achieve their ends, and ‘wake up and smell the coffee’ 🙂

Fake Probable Cause

I like the way that the torch has been positioned along with a note that I deliberately wrote a week or so ago with the words ‘keep these safe’ and had put in my trouser pocket! So the note suddenly appeared on a table with some DVDs, Rhodium Letterheads, passwords, a USB drive as well as a Micro sd card.

I do not even arrange drives like that – it was set up in that way and photographed to try and obtain a search warrant for those items elsewhere – very sad and obviously fraudulent. My stuff EVERYWHERE has been SANITISED so good luck finding anything. If something has been obtained then there is an intelligent explanation that plebians would not be able to elucidate on their own.

Reviewing the EXIF information on those photos will reveal the same time period, as well as the time-stamp may be at night 🙂

Note the photocopy and the original. Note how the photocopy is typed correctly, but the original (which is the one required by HMRC) is not. This was no mistake, Ray is a Fellow of the CAEW, and additionally other recordings with Ray confirm he knew that the original HMRC form was required…

Replacement of Cables

I do not have time to roll my cables like this – in a working environment everything is out and straight, because it is used all the time. These USB cables introduced malware onto our local area networks, and conveniently bypassed hardware firewalls.

I knew about the NSA attacks for years due to my ‘other’ work around 2009 (when I was summoned to the Bahamas for training), and Cottonmouth in particular:-

This video was only released 3 months ago and this type of attack needs an insider and attacker in close proximity. This is how my passwords were continually compromised and systems using decryption keys of 4096 bits were compromised in less than a minute 🙂

BIOS Hacked

As can be seen the BIOS of one of my systems has been modified, and this often leads to spelling mistakes on the display. Commercial Manufacturers do not make these type of errors. What does ‘failly’ mean exactly – it used to say ‘failed’ before December 2015!

IMSI Catchers

The following are screenshots of two of my Samsung SM-A500G mobiles, the Mobile Network Code is 04 and 11 on 21 October 2015. Both of these are non-commercial networks,which are not even listed in Sri Lanka.

It either means a military aspect to this fraudulent bullshit and/or a Foreign Party is involved, typically by the use of a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty request. Had they provided the Fake Base Transceiver Stations (IMSI Catchers) then that would explain how I was able to detect non-commercial MNCs.

The Hegelian Dialectic

The Psychiatric Scam is just a charade and is the classic Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis, also known as Problem, Reaction, Solution.

(a) Joe de Saram has evidence which nails everyone, and the perpetrators want it.

(b) Edward de Saram turns up to creates a crisis, thereby removing Joe from his house.

(c) Joe returns to the house and finds the evidence destroyed and the perpetrators have the evidence. However it is sadly (for them) less than 5% – ha ha!)

Even this Attorney could grasp the Psychiatric Scam:-

https://soundcloud.com/user-93619079/20160118-parents-organising-fraud1/s-iuSAW

Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1021430/the-art-of-deception-training-for-a-new.pdf

This is just the tip of the iceberg sadly, and I can understand what Edward Snowden and Julian Assange are going through. I have extremely robust evidence, dare I say it ‘irrefutable’ and will provide it at the right time in order to collapse the case 🙂

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

More on Gaslighting

More on Gaslighting

Gaslighters deny the truth by conveniently forgetting that which actually transpired to protect themselves, to humiliate their victims and to remove all credibility from their victims.

https://soundcloud.com/user-93619079/20160802-105431-praxy-de-saram-two-faced-lies-denials-1/s-7ZQqJ

https://soundcloud.com/user-93619079/20160802-105431-praxy-de-saram-two-faced-lies-denials-2/s-ONxrg

Doctors Exposed

By | Z MIGRATION IN PROGESS B

Doctors Exposed (±x)

Published on 30th November 2016
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
272

Enter more text here

On 17 December 2015, I was subjected to one of the most ridiculous frauds that I have ever seen, in fact worse than the ones that law enforcement run to entrap people 🙂

I am still getting over the destruction of evidentiary materials and every day I locate new recordings demonstrating the fraud perpetrated by Edward de Saram and Praxy de Saram amongst others. However, I am extremely resilient so it is just another day in the office.

In view of the voluminous amount of materials Tania and I have, we have decided to publish the same to (a) enable others to identify the warnings early on and (b) to share evidentiary materials before another scam takes away another strong position from us 🙂

The various psychiatrist ‘batchmates’ of the above will have their recordings published and their licensing will certainly be an issue for them. Eventually we will make it a commercial site with lawyers and advice for pursuing medical negligence claims.

As there is a lot of information, we have the main site, as well as the sub-sites.

Doctors.exposed – the main site with sub-sites bearing the name of the doctor in the format xxx.yyy.zzz.doctors.exposed, in which xxx relates to the first name of the doctor, yyy relates to the surname of the doctor and zzz relates to the ISO 3166 country code where they practise. A worked example for Dr Yuri Zhivago would be http://yuri.zhivago.rus.doctors.exposed .

Doctors with non-medical issues (such as those running frauds on behalf of fools) will also be featured. As an introduction to the new site, we are launching with the following recording:-

The ‘hello’ may be from a different person, Dr Prasad doesn’t seem to know his own girlfriend’s name and takes 9 seconds to provide it and the entire conversation is staged as usual 🙂

It relates to a case we have against Margaret Cunniffe and David Brown, in which parties in Sri Lanka are trying to entrap me, and provide the foregoing fraudsters with a pseudo-defence – another McDonald Slater & Lay Construct no less!

The recording took place about a week or so from memory, after the case was filed in the Supreme Court of Victoria for Defamation.

I of course have UK and LK Citizenships and was born in Colombo, but I am disappointed that Sri Lanka is still one of the most corrupt countries in the world and the GroupThink prefers to keep it that way…

Accordingly do NOT accept any third party evidence purportedly obtained from Sri Lanka or a country in which Sri Lankans are able to obtain a visa on arrival (such as Singapore and Bahamas) – there are numerous [albeit dim] forces at work 🙂

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP