Psychiatric Fraud Denied ‘The Right Against Self-Incrimination’

By | POLITICAL PSYCHIATRY
psychiatric-fraud-denied-the-right-against-self-incrimination-by-joseph-de-seram-linkedin

Psychiatric Fraud Denied 'The Right Against Self-Incrimination' ±

Published on 2nd November 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
1091

Enter more text here

The right to remain silent is a legal right recognized, explicitly or by convention, in many of the world’s legal systems.

The right covers a number of issues centered on the right of the accused or the defendant to refuse to comment or provide an answer when questioned, either prior to or during legal proceedings in a court of law.

This can be the right to avoid self-incrimination or the right to remain silent when questioned. The right usually includes the provision that adverse comments or inferences cannot be made by the judge or jury regarding the refusal by a defendant to answer questions before or during a trial, hearing or any other legal proceeding. This right constitutes only a small part of the defendant’s rights as a whole.

This article confirms the legal basis by which Perversion of the Course of Justice has occurred, and as a direct result of the Psychiatric Fraud.

My ‘Right Against Self-Incrimination’ has been REMOVED ENTIRELY!!

Case Law – de Mel v Haniffa

The case of de Mel v Haniffa contains an EXPLICIT DECISION – it was UNEQUIVOCALLY HELD by a Bench of three Judges that:-

“An accused person cannot be compelled to produce, during the pendency of criminal proceedings which had been instituted against him, any documents in his possession which may provide evidence against him.”

https://www.lawnet.gov.lk/1977/12/31/r-a-de-mel-et-al-petitioners-and-haniffa-respondent/

“Gratiaen J observed: “To my mind, it is implicit in the scheme of our law that here, as in England, once proceedings have been initiated against an accused person, he is placed in a special category separating him and others in a like situation from the generality of mankind until the verdict has been pronounced. The precarious position in which he stands entitles him at the same time to protection in certain respects, and this is the basis of the special rule whereby he cannot be compelled or legally required to contribute to the proof of his alleged guilt by giving or providing, even indirectly, evidence against himself”.

THE PSYCHIATRIC FRAUD SPECTACULARLY BYPASSED THIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT BY THE EXFILTRATION OF DATA AND OTHER MY MATERIALS FROM MY HOME, AS WELL AS MATERIALS THAT WERE SUBJECT TO LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE.

This is the relevance of the term Restricted Patient, and well as the relevance to the Psychiatric Fraud itself – it was not a defence that EDS was trying to assist me with – he was actually acting in the capacity of an agent of law enforcement when he was facilitating the perversion of the course of justice ON THEIR BEHALF!

The Restricted Patient

One of my favourite films, and even this as a Spying / Military Theme can you believe? Ha ha] What is a Restricted Patient Restricted patients are...

The Constitutional Right to Remain Silent

The “right to remain silent” is well-known to anyone who watches movies or TV shows about police, but the constitutional rights that the statement represents are not always very well understood. The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects people from being compelled to give testimony that could incriminate them. This is not the same as saying that a person has a right to silence at all times. In some situations, police may use silence itself as incriminating evidence. The Supreme Court has held that police must stop questioning suspects once they assert their right to counsel, but it has also held that a person must affirmatively invoke the right to silence.

Silence at Trial

The Fifth Amendment states that “[n]o person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” The right to silence is among the Miranda rights that police must recite during or shortly after an arrest. The primary application of this right occurs during criminal court proceedings, where prosecutors are not allowed to call the defendant as a witness. The defendant has sole discretion over whether to testify at trial, and prosecutors may not comment if the defendant decides not to do so. Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965); Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222 (1971).

Immunity

An exception to the right against self-incrimination in court applies if prosecutors have granted the person immunity from prosecution. The Supreme Court has held that the immunity provisions of federal law offer the same protections as the Fifth Amendment. Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 462 (1972).

Silence During Police Interviews or Interrogations

The question of whether a person has a right to silence, essentially meaning a right to refuse to speak to police or answer their questions, has no simple answer. As a very general rule, no one is obligated to speak to the police, but even non-verbal communication can, in some situations, be incriminating.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), which gave us the well-known Miranda warnings, requires police to cease any and all interrogation once a person has invoked the right to an attorney, and it holds that any statements made afterwards are inadmissible in court. This only applies, however, after police have advised the person of their Miranda rights, which they are only obligated to do once they have placed that person under arrest.

Failure to Invoke the Right to Silence

Two recent court cases illustrate situations when a person’s silence could be used against him or her, without violating the Fifth Amendment or Miranda. Both involve failure by the defendant to assert the right to silence.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Salinas v. Texas, 570 U.S. __ (2013), dealt with a situation in which the defendant spoke to the police voluntarily during a murder investigation, meaning that he was not under arrest when the purportedly incriminating event occurred.

When the police officer asked the defendant about his possible involvement in the murder, the officer testified, the defendant became very quiet, and his entire demeanor changed.

[EDS CONTINUALLY DROPS HIS VOICE TO A WHISPER WHEN HE KNOWS THAT HE IS DOING OR ABOUT TO DO ANYTHING CRIMINAL – IT IS A SIGNATURE THEME HE DEMONSTRATES AND HE CONTINUALLY CONFIRMS PREMEDITATION IRREFUTABLY]

Police offered the defendant’s silence and behavioral change as incriminating evidence. The court held that police did not violate the defendant’s rights against self-incrimination, in part because the defendant did not expressly invoke his Fifth Amendment rights.

The California Supreme Court reached a similar conclusion in a recent decision, People v. Tom, No. S202107 (Cal., Aug. 14, 2014), which involved evidence of literal silence after an alleged drunk-driving accident—specifically, that the defendant “expressed no concern about the well-being of the other people involved in the collision.” Since this lack of concern occurred after the defendant’s arrest but before he received Miranda warnings, and because he did not expressly assert his right to silence, the court held that his rights were not violated.

Relevance to the Psychiatric Fraud

I read an interesting article today by Chandra Tilake Edirisuriya dated 19 May 2017 and published in Ceylon Today.

 

Following on from other articles in the CHIS series:-

LAW OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

In the case of Chettiar v Darley Butler & Company (1932) 34 NLR 41, two connected proceedings were brought up in revision. In the first case, a person who had not yet instituted criminal proceedings against another on a contemplated charge of cheating...

I specifically refer to the following sections, and have made some small highlighting and editing changes:-

In the case of Chettiar v Darley Butler & Company (1932) 34 NLR 41, two connected proceedings were brought up in revision. In the first case, a person who had not yet instituted criminal proceedings against another on a contemplated charge of cheating had obtained a search warrant in respect of certain bags of rice which were alleged to have formed the subject-matter of the offence. In quashing the Magistrate’s order for the issue of a search warrant, Akbar J was content to say that the material placed before the Magistrate was insufficient to justify the issue of a search warrant.

[SADLY I GET ACCUSED OF THIS ALL THE TIME!]

“In the connected case, the respondent had charged the petitioner with criminal breach of trust in respect of some bags of rice (allegedly the property of the respondent) which he had entrusted to the petitioner as a bailee. The Magistrate allowed the respondent’s application for a general search warrant for the discovery of the rice. Akbar J agreed that a Magistrate had very wide powers to issue a search warrant for the purpose of the investigation of an offence which had been disclosed by legal evidence on record, but commented adversely on the fact that the warrant had been obtained in this case on hearsay evidence.”

[EDS AND PDS CONTINUALLY DEMONSTRATE CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST AND THEIR CONTINUAL PERVERSION OF THE COURSE OF JUSTICE IS LAUGHABLE – IN FACT THEIR DESIRE TO ‘TICK ALL THE BOXES’ MEANS THAT THEIR PERVERSION CAN BE USED AS MY OWN EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE.]

“It was decided in the case of Police Sergeant, Tangalle v Porthenis (1920) 22 NLR 163 that the principle deducible from the decision in Chettiar’s case is that the power of a Court to issue a search warrant for the investigation of an offence can be exercised only when the offence has been disclosed prima facie by evidence which had been properly admitted.”

“The definition of situations in Sub-sections (a) and (b) of Section 68 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Act No 15 of 1979, in which a Court is empowered to issue a search warrant, includes references to “a document or other thing”.

“It has been held in the cases of de Soysa v Karagan (1892) 1 SCR 101 and Jonklaas v Silva (1892) 1 SCR 199 that the word “thing”, in the two relevant Sub-sections, has a wide meaning. It is not to be construed as referring to a thing eiusdem generis with the word “document” as used in the same context. The word “thing”, then encompasses all categories of real evidence such as physical objects, articles and specimens.”

[LAWFULLY AND UNLAWFULLY-OBTAINED WARRANTLESS SURVEILLANCE, AS WELL AS CALL RECORDINGS AND WOULD FALL INTO THIS CATEGORY BUT THEY NEED TO BE GENUINE AND PROPERLY ADMITTED – AN EASY ONE TO CHALLENGE.]

“Situation (c) in which a search warrant may be issued by a Court appears to be of very extensive scope, but the area of its applicability had been curtailed by judicial interpretation. An important consideration in this regard is that the power conferred by this provision cannot be availed of to the detriment of an accused person,” says Professor G.L. Peiris in his landmark thesis ‘Criminal Procedure in Sri Lanka’.”

“The phrase “an accused person” is used here “in the sense in which these words describe a person against whom criminal proceedings have actually been instituted and are pending in a Court of criminal judicature” as Gratiaen J said in the case of de Mel v Haniffa (1952) 53 NLR 433 at page 438,” adds Prof. Peiris.”

Criminal Breach of Trust

“In Re Abdul Latiff (1917) 19 NLR 346, the complainant had instituted proceedings against his partner for criminal breach of trust in respect of certain partnership assets. Pending the inquiry, he obtained a search warrant to secure the production and inspection of all books of the partnership business. Wood Renton J held (with Sampayo J concurring) that, under Sub-section (c) of the relevant provision, the Magistrate had full power to order a general search for, and inspection of, all books of the partnership if he considered the adoption of that course necessary for the purpose of proceedings. However, the Court expressly refrained from deciding whether exception could successfully be taken on behalf of the accused at the trial to the admission in evidence against him of the books covered by the search warrant.”

Power to Restrict a Warrant

“On the power to restrict a warrant Section 69 lays down that the Court may if it thinks fit specify in the warrant the particular place or part thereof to which only the search or inspection shall extend, and the person charged with the execution of such warrant shall then search or inspect only the place or part so specified.”

“On the requirement that an officer should make a list of the things seized, Section 75 lays down that the person executing the search warrant shall make a list of all things seized in the course of the search and of the places in which they are respectively found and shall sign such list.”

[NO-ONE HAS PROVIDED ME WITH A LIST OF ITEMS SEIZED AND NO EVIDENCE OF WHERE AND HOW THEY ARE ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED AT MY PROPERTY.]

I refer to this article:-

 

Evidence of Parallel Construction

20180118 UPDATES I have cross-referenced a few articles which will make my ‘adventures’ easier to comprehend 🙂 20170324 INITIAL

“On the provision that the occupant of the place search may attend, Section 76 lays down that the occupant of the place searched or some person on his behalf shall in every instance be permitted to attend during the search and a copy of the list prepared under Section 75, signed by the person executing the warrant, shall be delivered to such occupant or person.”

[THE PSYCHIATRIC FRAUD RUN BY EDS ENSURED THAT I WAS NOT ABLE TO ATTEND, AND AS STATED IN THE PARAGRAPH ABOVE NO LIST WAS DELIVERED TO ME. MORE IMPORTANTLY I KNEW THAT IT WAS GOING TO TAKE PLACE FROM MY CALLS WITH SILVA AND ACCORDINGLY I WAS PREPARED TO CHALLENGE IT MYSELF WITH INTERLOCUTORIES.

 

Monaco

Early Identification of Issues From around August 2015 I identified increased covert surveillance and electronic disruption. Actually I first realised...

EDS FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED MY LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP AND PREVENTED ME PARTICIPATING IN MY OWN DEFENCE AND THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL!

MANY OF MY OTHER LINKEDIN ARTICLES REFER TO ANTON PILLER-TYPE ORDERS.]

Serious Fraudster Office

I read some very interesting articles today about the Serious Fraud Office. I note that there are so many signature themes presented by Vincent

“On the powers of a Magistrate when he is present at a search, Section 79 lays down that (1) the Magistrate by whom a search warrant is issued may attend personally for the purpose of seeing that the warrant is duly executed and (2) that any Magistrate may orally direct a search to be made in his presence, of any place for the search of which he is competent to issue a search warrant.”

Questions So Far

Acquisition of evidence lawfully would have required a Magistrates Court order at the very least The question is ‘was one obtained or not’?

If an order was obtained, then the Psychiatric Fraud prevented me from challenging it, prevented me from instructing my own attorneys, and even obtaining independent attorneys to oversee the process.

I would have followed established Anton Piller protocols OBVIOUSLY and any court order would then have been administered properly, and fair to both parties.

If there was No Court Order:-

No Court Order

Apparently I 'incorporate what I see around me into my system':- 20141213 100730 More BULLSHIT from Edward de Saram ("EDS") and once again completely...

which has been a feature of this Psychiatric Free-for-all then it confirms

YET ANOTHER VIOLATION OF MY HUMAN RIGHTS

Natural Justice has been irreparably compromised and this is a:-

A MASSIVE PERVERSION OF THE COURSE OF JUSTICE

Obviously my defence materials have been stolen and 10 terabytes is a lot of material, and it is handy that I have this forensic evidence which confirms that I am completely correct in my assertions:-

Destruction of Evidence and Perversion of the Course of Justice

20171006 UPDATE - FORENSIC EVIDENCE CONFIRMING THIRD PARTIES Notwithstanding the FACT that parties had OBVIOUSLY entered my house, and had stolen

And it is more handy that I have managed to cleverly recover evidence with nails the perpetratorsI need a lot more time to attempt to recover more data but things are looking extremely promising – it has taken me nearly two years to get to this point…

Of particular interest is the forensic evidence that confirms the deliberate destruction of my data by the investigators and their agents themselves – that is another massive problem for them!!

This VERY INTERESTING CASE continues…

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

Abduction Ahead of Rendition

By | MILITARY INTELLIGENCE EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION
abduction-ahead-of-rendition-joseph-de-saram-rhodium-linkedin

Abduction Ahead of Rendition ±

Published on 1st October 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
761

Enter more text here

“I have a very particular set of skills, skills I’ve acquired over a very long career, skills that make me a nightmare for people…”

Background

As is obvious from my LinkedIn Articles I have outstanding Intelligence Analysis skills as well as Cryptographic, Forensic and Legal. Technical Surveillance Countermeasures (“TSCM”) is the one that I am having to use at the moment, but I am an expert on Signals Intelligence (“SIGINT”) and Communications Security (“COMSEC”).

And to top it all off I am a

Human Rights Activist

so

MY ADVERSARIES ALWAYS HAVE A STRONG POLITICAL MOTIVE

to make a nuisance of themselves…

Please refer to this article:-

Destruction of Evidence Facilitated by Psychiatric Fraud

Please add me to your connections and read other unusual articles relating to Information Security, Forensics, and Fundamental Human Rights...

Iatrogenesis in Psychiatric Fraud

Please add me to your connections and read other unusual articles relating to Information Security, Forensics, and Fundamental Human Rights...

THE FOLLOWING AUDIO RECORDINGS WERE FORENSICALLY EXTRACTED FROM THE MOBILE PHONE OF EDWARD DE SARAM (“EDS”) AFTER I MANAGED TO GET OUT OF THE PSYCHIATRIC FACILITY.

REMEMBER FOLKS, IT IS NOT MY VOICE ON THESE RECORDINGS, AND I AM NOT THE ONE WITH THE PROBLEM 🙂

Forensic Evidence

20151212 234006 Excerpt 01

NXR – “Hello.

EDS – “Hello Newton, can you hear me?”

NXR – “Did you get the appointment.

EDS – “I got the appointment, but after that, Joe said he didn’t want to leave the house… [doctor] said that there is a team at Park Hospital, where if you call that team that they will come and take Joe.

[SIGH – EDS AND NEWTON RANASINGHE (“NXR”) FAILED MISERABLY BECAUSE I DO NOT HAVE A PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEM AND COULD DEFEND MYSELF DESPITE THE TORTURE AND EVERYTHING ELSE

BECAUSE WHAT ENDED UP HAPPENING WAS A TEXTBOOK MILITARY INTELLIGENCE OPERATION INVOLVING IRREGULAR RENDITION PROTOCOLS:)]

20151212 234006 Excerpt 06

EDS – “But the problem with Joe is that he doesn’t leave the house.

[THE REASON I DO NOT LIKE GOING OUT IS BECAUSE I WOULD THEN HAVE TO DEAL WITH A CLASSLESS GROUP OF PEOPLE, DWELLING WITHIN A LAWLESS SOCIETY, WHO THINK IN THE SAME GROUPTHINK FASHION THAT EDS AND PDS DO.

ALSO BECAUSE OF MY HEART PROBLEMS I AM REALLY BEHIND ON COMMERCIAL MATTERS SUCH AS GLOBAL REGULARISATION. I AM SURE MY BUSINESS CONTACTS WOULD PREFER ME TO SIT AND HOME AND SORT OUT PROBLEMS THAN GO GALLIVANTING AROUND.

AND OF COURSE IT IS DANGEROUS BECAUSE OF THE MASSIVE CORRUPTION AND CRIMINAL VIOLENCE.]

20151212 234006 Excerpt 07

EDS – “Even if a team went to Joe’s house, there is a front gate, the person who has the key for the gate is Joe, all keys for the inside doors of the house are with JoeSo for anyone to take Joe is impossible.

[WHY ARE THESE BABOONS OBSESSED IN TAKING ME ANYWAY? OH I FORGOT IT WAS FOR EXTRAJUDICIAL KILLING / IRREGULAR RENDITION.]

20151212 234006 Excerpt 09

EDS – “Afterwards, I spoke to Upul in the night, after an afternoon call, Upali asking what can be done. Upali said then in that case, he has a friend who is in charge of Ungoda… but the problem his we can’t get [Joe] from out of the house. Joe says ‘can’t go out’. So the only way to get Joe is by breaking down the doors… I am not sure whether that can be done lawfully, for a private house… Joe is the lawyer, Joe knows the correct legal position…so tomorrow I am going to ask Gaya [Pathikirikorale] to see if we can get some [fraudulent] support [from the police].

[OF COURSE IT WAS UNLAWFUL WHICH IS WHY EDS WANTED TO FRAUDULENTLY OBTAIN MY LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP AS THE FIRST STEP.]

20151212 234006 Excerpt 30

EDS – “I am going to see the doctor as Police Park Hospital.

NXR – “Right, okay.

EDS – “I’m going to arrange an appointment and discuss the matters with him.

NXR – “After speaking he will suggest some ideas.

EDS – “He needs treatment, but if he is refusing we need to know because Joe is the lawyer… Joe knows all about the correct legal basis.

[I NEVER NEEDED TREATMENT – IT WAS ALL A FRAUD BY EDS AND NXR AS USUAL.]

NXR – “But this is Ceylon law…”

Psychiatric Fraud - Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat

Ignorantia juris non excusat or ignorantia legis neminem excusat (Latin for "ignorance of the law excuses not" and "ignorance of law excuses no one"...

EDS – “Ceylon law it may be but Joe knows about Human Rights and he is always talking about it… in any event I will speak to some people… you and me talking about it makes no difference.

[MY FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS WERE/ARE CONTINUALLY TRASHED, WHICH HAS THE EFFECT OF ME FIGHTING EVEN HARDER FOR THEM.]

NXR – “[unclear].

EDS – “I know what to do, I will say ‘this is the fellow, he needs to come here [UK] , so then he will say these are the [unlawful] options that are available.

[EVEN UNDER THE LAWS OF SRI LANKA, THIS TYPE OF PROCEDURE IS UNLAWFUL SO I DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY WERE HOPING TO ACHIEVE BY GOING AROUND IN A SAD CRIMINAL FASHION SLAGGING ME OFF AND TRYING TO GET PEOPLE TO AGREE WITH THEM.]

20151212 234006 Excerpt 36

NXR – “That you can tell…

EDS – “That I will be telling the doctor and I will be telling the crash team as well.

NXR – “Yeah, yeah.

EDS – “I will speak with [Upali] about that.

NXR – “Yes, yes.

EDS – “I will speak to them and give you the feedback, do you understand, there’s no point me taking your advice because I need to know the local scene.

NXR – “Yes, yes.

EDS – “If [Joe] was co-operating then that’s fine. Ranjit’s group will get together and take him by forceJoe knows the law… he will immediately look up the internet and will know what is possible what will happen… if I mention ECT, Joe will look up the internet, Google and will look… then what happens if Joe says ‘I don’t want ECT’ then what do we do?

NXR – “Yes, yes.

[THIS AGREEMENT BY EDS AND NXT CONFIRMS THAT ECT WAS INTENDED FOR ME, AND MY CONSENT WAS DELIBERATELY NOT SOUGHT BECAUSE I WOULD HAVE REJECTED IT. THIS CONFIRMS THE ATTEMPTED MURDER AND CONFIRMS THAT THE GARBAGE ABOUT ME HAVING NO INSIGHT IS ENTIRELY FALSE.

EDS CONFIRMS HIMSELF THAT IF HE MENTIONED ECT TO ME (IE REQUIRE MY INFORMED CONSENT) IT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. THIS EXPLAINS WHY THERE WERE THE MASSIVE AMOUNT OF LIES THAT EDS AND PDS HAVE BEEN DISSEMINATING.

PARTIES IN SRI LANKA WANTED TO HARM ME, AND THREE UK CITIZENS, ALL DOCTORS, EDS, NXR AND PDS WERE TOO SPINELESS TO DEFEND ME, INSTEAD JOINING THEM IN THE FURTHERANCE OF THE ORIGINAL FRAUD AND FACILITATING THE IRREGULAR RENDITION AS INSTRUCTED BY OTHER UK PARTIES.]

EDS – “Now in your situation, there isn’t such a group… they went there, an injection was given, Joe knows the subject, he confronts people.

[WELL DUH! SO MAYBE THEY SHOULD HAVE NOT TAKEN ME ON.]

NXR – “Yes.

EDS – “So that’s the problem.

[YES IT IS A PROBLEM IF PARTIES WANT TO INJURE ME VIA CRIMINAL ACTS.]

NXR – “See if you can [unclear].

EDS – “[unclear] I will try and call and give an update.

Conclusion

That which was being proposed was in fact an

* * EXTRAJUDICIAL PROCESS – KILLING OR RENDITION * *

and as can be heard both EDS and NXR knew 5 DAYS BEFORE, that which they were proposing was

* * ENTIRELY UNLAWFUL * *

They continually reminded themselves that they needed to be careful because of my knowledge of the law, which is incredibly bizarre if they were actually acting within it.

Any right-thinking person can see the various flaws in their fraud as they were conducting it, but sadly none of them have any insight – odd how they say that of me but this phenomena is called Psychological Projection.

Absolutely Spineless

These ShitLankansTM have neither the brains nor the balls to run an operation such as this against me – this is the relevance of the ‘Restricted Patient’ label:-

The Restricted Patient

[One of my favourite films, and even this as a Spying / Military Theme can you believe? Ha ha] What is a Restricted Patient Restricted patients are persons detained in hospital under a compulsion order with a restriction order. They have usually committed an offence punishable by imprisonment but as a result of mental disorder are not imprisoned but ordered to be detained in hospital for treatment, without limit of time.

which RECONFIRMS THE OFFICIAL NATURE 🙂

The bottom line is:-

“You can take the monkey out of the jungle but you can’t take the jungle out of the monkey.”

The case continues…

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

Sudden Cardiac Arrest caused by Psychological and Physical Torture

By | TORTURE
sudden-cardiac-arrest-caused-by-psychological-and-physical-torture-joseph-de-saram-rhodium-linkedin

Sudden Cardiac Arrest caused by Psychological and Physical Torture (±x)

Published on 24th September 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
632

Enter more text here

There is plenty of evidence to support that Intentionally-Inflicted Emotional Distress (“IIED”) can result in grievous bodily harm and even death…

In general, the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress involves some kind of conduct that is so terrible that it causes severe emotional trauma in the victim. In such cases, the victim can recover damages from the person causing the emotional distress.

Not all offensive conduct qualifies as intentional infliction of emotional distress, however. People in society must necessarily deal with a certain level of rude or offensive conduct. When the conduct rises to a truly reprehensible level, though, recovery for the resulting emotional trauma becomes available.

Elements

While some states’ specific rules for intentional infliction differ, the following elements are fairly common:

  • Extreme or outrageous conduct that
  • Intentionally or recklessly causes
  • Severe emotional distress (and possible also bodily harm)

If the situation satisfies all of the elements above, the person behaving in the extreme and outrageous manner is liable for both the severe emotional distress and the bodily harm that results from the stress (a miscarriage, for example).

In addition, parties may sometimes recover for emotional distress under circumstances where the extreme and outrageous conduct wasn’t even directed at them. Typically, this kind of claim involves extreme or outrageous conduct towards the claimant’s family member while in the claimant’s presence. This type of claim varies even more widely between the states than the basic intentional infliction tort, but here are some of the general elements of the injury:

  • Extreme and outrageous conduct
  • Directed at a third person that
  • Intentionally or recklessly causes
  • Severe emotional distress
  • To a member of the third person’s immediate family (whether or not bodily harm occurs), or
  • To any other person present if bodily harm occurs

Extreme and Outrageous Conduct

Clearly, one of the most important issues in any claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is defining what exactly constitutes extreme and outrageous conduct. Without extreme and outrageous conduct, the injured party can’t make a claim for intentional infliction even if the actor behaved with malice and/or harmful intent.

Extreme and outrageous conduct goes beyond merely the malicious, harmful or offensive. People must have a certain level of thick skin and possess the ability to weather ordinary rude or obnoxious behavior.

In order to rise to the level of extreme and outrageous, the conduct must exceed all possible bounds of decency. Normal insults or rudeness don’t normally qualify as extreme and outrageous conduct, although they can rise to that level if there is some kind of special relationship between the parties.

In addition, ordinary insults or actions can constitute extreme and outrageous behavior if the actor knows that the victim is particularly susceptible to emotional distress because of some physical or mental condition or abnormality. For example, if Adam knows that Barbara is intensely claustrophobic and intentionally locks her in a closet to scare her, she could possibly recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Exercising a legal right can never amount to intentional infliction of emotional distress, however even if the behavior does cause some severe emotional trauma. If a landlord properly initiates eviction proceedings against a sick and destitute widow who has not paid rent in a year, his actions won’t constitute intentional infliction of emotional distress even if the widow does in fact suffer an extreme emotional reaction. Since the landlord was only exercising his legal rights, his behavior is most likely privileged.

In the end, a jury makes the final decision on whether the conduct in question rises to the level of extreme and outrageous.

Intent/Recklessness

In addition to acting in an extreme an outrageous manner, the actor must act with intent or recklessness. In other words, the actor must intend to cause severe emotional distress or know that severe emotional distress is likely to occur. The actor can also become liable for intentional infliction if they behave with deliberate disregard to the high possibility that severe emotional distress will occur.

For example, if someone receives a text message from their significant other while at a friend’s house, becomes angry, and smashes the urn containing their friend’s mother’s ashes, the friend could possibly win an intentional infliction lawsuit under the theory of reckless disregard.

Severe Emotional Distress

Emotional distress can take many forms. Many unpleasant emotions qualify as emotional distress, including embarrassment, shame, fright and grief.

In order to satisfy the elements of an intentional infliction claim, however, the emotional distress in response to extreme and outrageous behavior must reach a “severe” level. The exact definition of severe emotional distress is vague, and plaintiffs must prove to a jury that the emotional distress they experienced reached a sufficient level of severity to justify an award for intentional infliction.

Some guidelines do exist to help determine whether an emotional disturbance constitutes severe emotional distress. When extreme and outrageous conduct causes suffering such that no reasonable person should have to endure it, a jury will likely hold that the experience reached the level of severe emotional distress.

The intensity and duration of the emotional distress also contribute to its severity. The longer the emotional disturbance continues, the more likely it is to constitute severe emotional distress.

A plaintiff must use evidence to demonstrate their emotional distress to a jury. For example, a plaintiff can use persistent anxiety and paranoia resulting from a Halloween prank gone bad to show that they suffered extreme emotional distress as a result of the conduct.

Sometimes the very nature of the conduct in question will suffice to demonstrate that the victim suffered severe emotional distress. If behavior is particularly disturbing, the plaintiff may not have to offer much evidence to support their claims; the behavior itself is so reprehensible that the emotional distress is almost assumed.

Bodily harm also acts as an indicator that severe emotional distress has occurred. Ulcers or headaches, for example, can show that the plaintiff has experienced severe emotional distress that has revealed itself through these physical symptoms.

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - FindLaw

In general, the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress involves some kind of conduct that is so terrible that it causes severe emotional trauma in the...

Medical Evidence

Patients with specific neurological, psychiatric or cardiovascular conditions are at enhanced risk of cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death. The neurogenic mechanisms are poorly understood.

However, in many cases, stress may precipitate cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death in vulnerable patients, presumably via centrally driven autonomic nervous system responses. From a cardiological perspective, the likelihood of arrhythmia is strongly associated with abnormalities in electrical repolarization (recovery) of the heart muscle after each contraction.

Inhomogeneous and asymmetric repolarization, reflected in ECG T-wave abnormalities, is associated with a greatly increased risk of arrhythmia, i.e. a proarrhythmic state. We therefore undertook a study to identify the brain mechanisms by which stress can induce cardiac arrhythmia through efferent autonomic drive.

We recruited a typical group of 10 out-patients attending a cardiological clinic. We simultaneously measured brain activity, using H215O PET, and the proarrhythmic state of the heart, using ECG, during mental and physical stress challenges and corresponding control conditions.

Proarrhythmic changes in the heart were quantified from two ECG-derived measures of repolarization inhomogeneity and were related to changes in magnitude and lateralization of regional brain activity reflected in regional cerebral blood flow. Across the patient group, we observed a robust positive relationship between right-lateralized asymmetry in midbrain activity and proarrhythmic abnormalities of cardiac repolarization (apparent in two independent ECG measures) during stress.

This association between stress-induced lateralization of midbrain activity and enhanced arrhythmic vulnerability provides empirical support for a putative mechanism for stress-induced sudden death, wherein lateralization of central autonomic drive during stress results in imbalanced activity in right and left cardiac sympathetic nerves.

A right–left asymmetry in sympathetic drive across the surface of the heart disrupts the electrophysiological homogeneity of ventricular repolarization, predisposing to arrhythmia. Our findings highlight a proximal brain basis for stress-induced cardiac arrhythmic vulnerability.

Mental stress and sudden cardiac death: asymmetric midbrain activity as a linking mechanism | Brain | Oxford Academic

Patients with specific neurological, psychiatric or cardiovascular conditions are at enhanced risk of cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death. The neurogenic mechanisms are poorly understood. However, in many cases, stress may precipitate cardiac ...
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

Government has Accepted Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice over Sri Lanka

By | UNIVERSAL-LK
Government-has-accepted-jurisdiction-of-the-International-Court-of-Justice-over-Sri-Lanka

Government has Accepted Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice over Sri Lanka

First Published on 19th September 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
1294

Enter more text here

20160802 122227 Joseph de Saram Serious Injuries from Torture

Government has accepted jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice over Sri Lanka

At the ongoing September 2017 sessions of the UN Human Rights Council, the UK has written to the President of the Council to assert that a long standing dispute it has with the Mauritius cannot be referred to the International Court of Justice because ...
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

Honour Based Violence

By | TORTURE

Honour Based Violence (±x)

Published on 26th April 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
742

Enter more text here

“There was an unexpected distraction for Professor Robert Kelly when he was being interviewed live on BBC News about South Korea. But he managed to keep his composure and complete the interview successfully.”

When I originally saw this video last month I thought the behaviour of Prof Kelly’s nanny was a little ridiculous and uneducated in the way that she grabbed his two young children.

When I subsequently found out that the woman was his wife, I was initially shocked at the way she manhandled her own children in order to ‘keep up appearances’ but then remembered that ‘Asians living in Asia have a justification for doing the wrong thing’ and ‘have an inability to tell right from wrong’.

Asians in the UK are among the best attorneys and Asians in New York are among the best private bankers. And we all know how clever Asians are in Silicon Valley 🙂

It is the physical location that is responsible for this issues, and the GroupThink environment of course.

Watching the video at 22s, the right arm of the child is violently jerked and I am surprised that there was not an anterior dislocation or even subluxation at her shoulder joint. A torsion fracture is another common injury for children, and I sustained a few whilst playing rugby in the U11s at Barlborough Hall School.

At 31s she is being dragged along the ground by the same arm. Is this normal behaviour? I am from the UK and I find it quite sickening actually.

Western v Asian Culture

The difference between the two are highlighted in two parody videos:-

the first 30 seconds of:-

The UK woman correctly identifies that her child is connected on a cellular-genetic level and that there is a loving bond between the pair of them. She does not allow a third party or event (such as a tv interview) to get in the way of that bond.

The Indian man (any South Asian culture will do) irrationally feels that the action of his son has brought a ‘great’ shame on him (first error of judgement) and then proceeds to beat up the child publicly in order to lift his ‘perceived’ estimation in the eyes of the interviewer (second error of judgement).

Honour Based Violence

A report from 08 December 2015 found that the majority of UK Police were ‘not properly prepared’:-

However I see that my old local police force Derbyshire Constabulary ‘passed all stages of the review’ and were only one of three to do so.

Globalizing Torture: CIA Secret Detention and Extraordinary Rendition

The most comprehensive account yet assembled of the human rights abuses associated with CIA secret detention and extraordinary rendition operations....

http://www.derbyshire.police.uk/Safety-advice/Personal-Safety/Forced-Marriages-and-Honour-Abuse.asp

Of course it is a shame that Edward de Saram (“EDS”) was ignorant of the report and his fraud of 17 December 2015 really fooled no-one apart from him, his audience and HMRC/NCA.

Asian Culture

‘Forced Marriage’ is the typical crime that comes to mind and the public perception tends to be about a woman who has done the ‘wrong thing’. Even children ‘disobeying’ their parents is the most heinous of crimes and I learned this the hard way when EDS discovered a love-letter from Ruth Burke in May 1986 or being told that I was not at a ‘marriageable age’ when ‘going out’ with Lisa Herbert. In these situations the fact that I had a girlfriend (or 10) was a massive problem.

A lot of the issues arise from ineptitude and complete lack of exposure of South Asians to the real world. I have realised that this issue is prevalent in countries that have formerly been British Colonies. It would seem that in Days of Empire, the ones in charge and who had the money were the ones who were best dressed.

Local Asians who were ordered around therefore identified those superior to them by their appearance and for many of the illiterate ones this was the only way.

And when the Asians returned to their children, they would chastise them in a humiliating way (given the fact that the parents most probably would have felt humiliated by having foreigners tell them what to do). However this does not imply that the foreigners treated them poorly – it is the irrational perception of the Asians and their own self-victimisation by which they get ‘brownie’ points (literally).

Actually this feature of Asians being subservient is known as MacArthur Syndrome:-

An example of this is when Sri Lanka played Australia at cricket, say around 20yrs ago. Despite Sri Lanka being the better team, the players would let their ‘irrational fear of the perceived strength of the opposition’ prevent them playing to the best of their abilities. Sri Lanka would then lose and the result would give credence to their original flawed opinion.

Asian Parents

These self-destructive self-fulfilling prophecies are often found in cultures where parents feel they ‘own’ their children.

Asian parents believes that they own their children and that's why they are so controlling? • r/AsianParentStories

As such the way for such Asians to survive in an ‘irrationally illogical’ culture was to focus on being ‘superficial two-faced polished turds’. The other cultural issue is that Asians have poor self-discipline – even my Singapore lawyers were classless liars and it is all about ‘what can they get away with’ rather than ‘full compliance with the law’ or even professional ethics.

Crown Prosecution Service – Honour based violence

  1. There is no specific offence of “honour based crime”. It is an umbrella term to encompass various offences covered by existing legislation. Honour based violence (HBV) can be described as a collection of practices, which are used to control behaviour within families or other social groups to protect perceived cultural and religious beliefs and/or honour. Such violence can occur when perpetrators perceive that a relative has shamed the family and/or community by breaking their honour code.
  2. It is a violation of human rights and may be a form of domestic and/or sexual violence. There is no, and cannot be, honour or justification for abusing the human rights of others.
  3. The CPS, ACPO and support groups have a common definition of HBV:
“‘Honour based violence’ is a crime or incident which has or may have been committed to protect or defend the honour of the family and/or community.”

Human Rights

I have always been a Human Rights Activist though that was in relation to mass electronic surveillance:-

Article 12.

“No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.”

Article 19.

“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

After what happened on 17 December 2015:-

Asking these fools why I need to open the door yielded an answer ‘Money Disruption’ – what does that mean? Or is that the new term for ‘Money Laundering’ – given the involvement of HMRC I think it is MLAT-related 🙂

I realised that other Fundamental Human Rights should never be taken for granted.

The enhanced audio is at http://www.jsrds.rehab and it really does confirm the fraud.

HMRC is Inextricably Involved

Ray Callingham failed in his mission to get the HMRC forms signed which would have opened up my income and asset structures – so after Fake Probable Cause and Staged Crime Scenes were effected by EDS from December 2015 onwards I needed to be removed from the house to enable their fraud to progress with no oversight. It is SO obvious really.

Clearly parties had been informed that I was under some criminal investigation (for not going to church or not eating enough vegetables, or some other crap propagated by the Melbourne Fraudsters no doubt) and EDS equated an ‘investigation’ to a ‘conviction’ and was goaded on by, and acting in the capacity of an agent of HMRC/NCA.

So actually did HMRC beat me up ? It is entirely foreseeable that investigators turning up to Sri Lanka stirring up people with the promise of references from the Queen and a new life if they helped them ‘catch’ me would have directly led to fools here taking the law into their own hands and inflicting violence against me.

Crown Prosecution Service – Extra Territorial Jurisdiction

  1. Subss (7) and (8) make provision to take extra-territorial jurisdiction over both the coercion and deception elements of the new offence. Any of the prohibited acts in subss (1) and (2) carried out outside the UK by a UK national or person habitually resident in England or Wales, or to a UK national or person habitually resident in England or Wales, will be an offence under domestic law and triable in the courts of England and Wales. The effect of subs (5)(b) is that it will also be an offence under domestic law if the prohibited acts in subs (1) or (2) are conducted by or against a person habitually resident in England and Wales, but take place in Scotland or Northern Ireland.

Private Prosecution Time for EDS

Other examples of HBV

Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (“MSbP”)

As an additional issue which is prevalent among Asian Parents is MSbP.

to be continued…

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

Also in this series

The majority of police forces’ failure to tackle “honour”-based violence is punishing victims

Gaslighting and Data Exfiltration v10

By | Z MIGRATION IN PROGESS B

Gaslighting and Data Exfiltration v10 (±x)

Published on 18th December 2016
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
425

Enter more text here

20161222 UPDATE – WHEN THE COPS ARE THE ROBBERS – SAD AND FUNNY AT THE SAME TIME!

This photo was taken on 04 December 2015, during the time that Edward de Saram was playing his sad gaslighting games and telling me that there was no-one coming into the house, despite copious evidence to the contrary.

I have mentioned Staged Crime Scenes for [FAKE] Probable Cause and this is a good example of Investigator Clowns being over-zealous in their sick desires to frame me. As can be seen a crate has been staged, with the insertion of a Crown Removals folder, with various GST forms and various materials.

I do not arrange paperwork in this way, and any fool can see that the first group of clowns have gone in to plant / arrange items, and the second group would have been told to ‘look for the crown’.

This entire farce is Sad and Funny at the same time – unfortunately because of my knowledge of Law Enforcement protocols, I knew that Edward de Saram was facilitating quite a spectacular fraud from about 01 December 2015. It is so easy to demonstrate Criminal Intent because he has such a big mouth and in fact called people to tell them about his scheming!

And I love the way people have deleted this image off our systems, but I love the way I have recovered it, a lot more 🙂

20161221 UPDATE – EXAMPLE OF A NAUSEATING SRI LANKAN DOCTOR WHO IS PARTICIPATING IN THE CRIMINAL FRAUD OF EDWARD DE SARAM AND PRAXY DE SARAM

Dr (Mrs) Dulmini Jayasundara is one of the most irritating condescending baboons that I have ever met. As anyone can listen from these recordings there are significant errors in her medical knowledge which I was more than happy to point out.

According to her (which is completely wrong) drinking 3 litres of water per day causes hyponatraemia. How could I run legal cases or design schematics if I was feeling dizzy. This is just another fraud and she is alleging self-harm. Excuse me? My mind is incredibly alert when fools here are not trying to impress their foreign overlords, even with the heart issues! The UK/AU people are primarily responsible for this fraud.

All that has happened is Edward de Saram is looking at the symptoms of Schizophrenia and telling her that I have polydipsia – utter nonsense. I have low blood pressure, been brought up in the UK where the climate is cold, and I sweat a lot in Sri Lanka. When I sweat (computer environments are warm) I drink between 2 and 3 litres of water.

http://www.cosmopolitan.co.uk/beauty-hair/advice/a35197/drinking-water-skin-benefits/

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=3+litres+of+water+a+day

6 litres in the recognised figure for too much water – https://youtu.be/TvcbIXvWl_k

So apparently me drinking between 2 and 3 litres of water is self-harm is it? Is this really an amazing reason to Unlawfully Imprison me in Psychiatric Facility?

The whole Schizophrenia lie of Edward de Saram is described here:-

There was no point giving that baboon an explanation about Edward de Saram’s Criminal Fraud re psychotropic medication because in Sri Lanka the parents are always right, and whoever gets in first with their story is believed – that is a cognitive deficit known as Arbitrary Inference (“AI”). It seems that simple explanations are more factually correct that the actual factual explanation which is complex, and AI is where people form conclusions based on insufficient evidence.

And according to her simply because I do not like my parents who are a pair of Sad Abusive Fraudsters, that means I am paranoid.

Even when I specifically asked her on what basis she is making her assessment, she is unable to answer – apart from citing my ‘notes’ which of course Edward de Saram dictated. That is all he does, gets his lies in early and presents them in a plausible way. Classic Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

When I ask her to look at Forensic Evidence she is not interested – she simply repeats her flawed conclusions ad nauseum and I am actually astonished that I remained so calm!!

When I explained to her that I have evidentiary materials and a business to run she could not care less. The whole point of me staying in the hospital is so that people could go through my evidentiary materials and plant / discover /destroy items. I think this Perversion of the Course of Justice is obvious to any Western person, who is not involved in this Sri Lankan / Australian / Singapore / United Kingdom Fraud.

And as a final insult she is asking to take blood continually, and demanding I eat the food. What the f***? She is actually trying to irritate me so that she can prove a point, like many of the retards in Sri Lanka do? Unfortunately I know what PSYOPs are and I never react, unless I want to provide disinformation.

The food actually contained psychotropic medication which I discovered and spat out that very day! I am very sensitive to even Monosodium Glutamate at restaurants in fact – with 10mins I can tell – I get an unusual headache.

The whole plan was to give me Electroconvulsive Therapy – but whilst the fools congratulate each other on their lack of brilliance, it is the brilliant one who identifies them so early on. ‘Trying to convince a Fool that they are Wrong is much harder than convincing a Genius that they are Wrong’. – JSRDS. Perception is confused with Paranoia because the GroupThink decides it to be the case.

Here is another recording of Edward de Saram ‘leaking intent’ – both these fools think I am taking the medication that they have put into the food. Even the way Edward de Saram describes the conversation with me is another fabrication – as I have the recording and did not say most of the things he is alleging.

Even Dr Horadugoda confirmed that I should deal with my parents – so they ARE behind the Fraud. This retard dismisses everything I say just because the amounts are large. Calling me disorganised? Excuse me – my files were perfect before Edward de Saram’s facilitation of the destruction of my evidence.

Edward de Saram effectively states that he has no enquiry – that is yet another lie as everyone who works with him knows. I am a little sick and tired of either hearing that I have no insight , or making things up when I have evidence of Cellular Jammers and GPS Jammers and extremely complex items of evidence that demonstrate what is REALLY going on.

People here are not too dissimilar to Australians in their incredible amounts of expertise for everything under the sun and of course their flawed opinion / logical flaws when they are utterly clueless about Electronic Surveillance from Military and Law Enforcement personnel.

The bottom line is this – despite all this crap, I still managed to get out of the Psychiatric Facility without another doctor’s opinion so it proves that I was fine all along. And finding around 10 terabytes of materials missing including the Ray Callingham HMRC evidence, sums up the actual situation perfectly!

20161220 UPDATE – HOUSTON HE HAS A PROBLEM

Ray Callingham was pushed by Edward de Saram and Praxy de Saram as the person who should provide the book-keeping service in order to regularise our accounts. Additionally he was responsible for the incorporation of three new entities in the UK, that I and other entities could transfer assets to.

I knew from the first trip that he was asking in the capacity of an Agent of Law Enforcement (“LE”) but it did not bother me, as I thought he would actually do some work. I recall he was asking me about various lawyers and banks and it was clear even from then that he was merely asking for my support infrastructure, so that Investigators could make a nuisance of themselves.

Even before he came, him sending me an e-mail telling me where I lived confirmed is LE involvement – often parties get obsessed with documenting names of software, addresses, amounts, urls so that it is confirmed. Praxy de Saram was doing it all the time and it was really irritating.

One thing I noticed that Ray was really annoyed about was that he forgot to bring the HMRC Agent form on the first trip. He made such a fuss about it I wondered what the issue was because there were no sales in the UK or anticipated sales in the foreseeable future. We were in the process of obtaining asset inventories and missing paperwork.

Around November 2015 Ray and Kim Worrall were coming for a longer period, to scan the documentation and then work on them, since Joanne Cochrane and Kalasegaran Genkatharan (who are directors of Rhodium Australia Pty Ltd and Rhodium Singapore Pte Ltd had done f*** all during my heart issues). I was merely putting in money and following their instructions to my detriment – my loan accounts are massive in fact, and I am owed tonnes via my role as Financier!

As Ray did not want to come unless it was Business Class, and I politely declined since Praxy de Saram was paying for the tickets. I recall he was adamant about Business Class. However he suddenly changed his mind and he and Kim were scheduled.

From the moment he came on 28 November 2015, I noticed Electromagnetic Emanation from the pair of them, in particular I thought it was Kim. Kim looked at me intently whilst I was speaking without moving her head, and Ray looked down. This is classic surveillance, in which two people have a conversation but only one looks – they also sit in a non-parallel fashion which caused to me to rotate my head continually. It was painful because of the recent accident.

This is the part where I was talking about ‘Police Informant’ and work in which I ghostwrite Expert Testimony’ and I obviously recognised the surveillance so talked about crap, Iain’s Jones’ case with his bank statements (it reminded me of a project I did):-

and the lights flickered EXACTLY as I predicted when I used keywords. Ray and Kim responded by saying ‘Kim did you see, that, the light flickered’ or words to that effect – classic Police!

Ray then wanted me to sign the Tax form – he wanted me to simply sign it and write nothing else, and he seemed agitated when I wanted to fill even Beeley Hawley on it etc. He continually told me that he would complete the other sections. The conclusion that could be drawn was that he was not the ultimate user of the Authorisation, and it was going to be completed with different information and faxed to third parties in multiple jurisdictions – really not rocket science. If he was the ultimate user he would have already completed the information.

Data Recovery

A few days ago I recovered the Beeley Hawley Audio and Video recordings – another one of those great mysterious of life is how they too have been deleted during Edward de Saram’s clean-up operation.

These audio recordings confirm the [fraudulent] misrepresentations made by Ray ahead of the visits, the deliverables he promised but reneged on, and most importantly confirms lack of a genuine interest to regularise our accounts. A simple Private Prosecution to recover the monies arising from Ray’s fraud would be good 🙂

As the calls went on, it became more of him wanting certain items in a particular order, rather than him doing the work thoroughly and obtaining the items in any event, but merely not in his order…

And today I found the audio recordings of special interest, in which Ray asked me to sign the HMRC Authorisation on 29 November 2015, and I am in in the process of analysing these:-

https://soundcloud.com/user-93619079/20151129b-ray-callingham-instructing-not-to-date-hmrc-form/s-NCH1V

Ray’s instruction to me is “Don’t date it because if they lose it then I will need to submit another one later on” – excuse me? What utter bullshit! If Ray has to submit another one later on then it would need to be another original. Ray has to submit the original in order for it to be valid so how will not dating it make the slightest bit of difference. Why does Ray think HMRC will lose it, or is it going to be a template with my signature on for every Corporate Entity and Trust, the number yet to be determined!! Seems like the Gift that keeps on giving!

Not wishing me to date it would have given two options of either 28 November 2015 or 29 November 2015, if the audio evidence and discussions from the previous day were going to be used. Classic Police with an HMRC investigation thrown in 🙂

Ray had a bizarre interest in Taxation, Income and Payments, despite the fact that he is not qualified and/or licensed to give Taxation Advice for any of the jurisdictions in question. We had not even started the bookkeeping yet so how is taxation relevant? I had not earned for years so how was Income relevant? It was tiring though I was still polite (very unusual of me) after I cleverly identified his fraud 🙂

So I asked for the forms back, after Ray confirmed that they were effectively obsolete:-

And Ray was reluctant to, saying “Let me copy it as that will give me some information.” What information – the only thing is essentially my signature. Another bullshit excuse since it was he who typed the document and therefore he had his information already. I knew that that the form was going to be amended continually and faxed to third parties!

And of course the existence of a VAT Investigation against me in the late 1990s would allow my enemies to gather information and go on a fishing trip – Margaret Cunniffe is the liar at the heart of all this, obviously, and she does not know the actual position!

So after a while I simply told him that I knew what was going on. His guilty responses and how he subseqently slinked away was funny, but to truly appreciate you really have had to have been there 🙂

20161219 UPDATE – HOUSTON THEY HAVE A PROBLEM

The following screenshots were taken in 2014, and demonstrated various Criminal Offences by Margaret Cunniffe and David Brown. Mysteriously this evidence had been wiped from our systems, and the Samsung Galaxy S3 phone had become a brick during the events of December 2015. This S3 is Rhodium Equipment – the mere fact that the phone was ‘clean’ when provided to me (contacts deleted, sms deleted) and I have subsequently recovered incriminating evidence confirms the Consciousness of Guilt when they wiped it.

However, having recovered the original photos, we see two things:-

(a) they are Direct Evidence of the various Criminal Offences as well as Set-offs in civil cases against them;

(b) they are Circumstantial Evidence in the Destruction of Evidentiary Material / Fraud / Perversion of the Course of Justice cases against them and associated parties 🙂

Deleted Contacts, so we cannot liaise with them re Recovery of Assets

Abuse of Process by David Brown – asking Simon Thompson to put a Caveat on a property of AUD 650,000 despite them concurrently [fraudulently] obtaining Security of Costs for AUD 40,000

David Brown asking for the password for a Rhodium laptop in order to wipe it:-

David Brown instructing Margaret Cunniffe in relation to Criminal Conversion, and desposing of one of Joe’s/RHO’s Assets that they have stolen:-

David Brown instructing Margaret Cunniffe to Convert further Joe assets and place the proceeds into David Brown’s bank account:-

David Brown instructing Margaret Cunniffe to sell VIP Memberships:-

David Brown pleased that Margaret Cunniffe has Converted Joe’s assets into cash at the Pawnbroker:-

378 Chappel Street – http://www.chapelstreetpawnbrokers.com.au/

More Destruction of Evidence, this time in relation to an e-mail to Simon Thompson that was sent from the Premium IT account:-

Margaret Cunniffe demand that David Brown make VIP Club Membership sales

Clearly the Psychiatric Scam was absolutely nothing to do with Psychiatry – it was an elaborate fraud by Edward de Saram and Praxy de Saram to Pervert the Course of Justice, destroy all my legal cases (defences and counterclaims) and attempt to destroy Rhodium – how absolutely pathetic!

Margaret Cunniffe demand that David Brown make VIP Club Membership sales

Clearly the Psychiatric Scam was absolutely nothing to do with Psychiatry – it was an elaborate fraud by Edward de Saram and Praxy de Saram to Pervert the Course of Justice, destroy all my legal cases (defences and counterclaims) and attempt to destroy Rhodium – how absolutely pathetic!

Incapacitating the Victim by Psychological Fraud

I have previously mentioned, the entire Psychiatric Facility Scam fabricated by Edward de Saram, Praxy de Saram, and their co-conspirators was easily detectable and utterly ridiculous.

However, what has not been fully elucidated it what occurred at the early part of the fraud, as in how was I weakened to such an extent and why was the problem of my agitation so compounded towards the end.

This is where I would have normally relied on my evidence and video footage that I had actually made during Ray Callingham’s visit and the ridiculous visit of Edward de Saram. Nothing confirms the state of mind better than video and audio evidence made at the time.

As usual and of course blissfully conveniently, terabytes of data had been wiped, and these were files that were specifically required by me in my defence. To demonstrate that another party, Edward de Saram was responsible for causing psychological harm can be demonstrated by his continually lies and manipulative techniques, and the following video is one of MANY items of evidence I now have.

It is self-explanatory – as usual I do not try to spell everything out – I am used to working with the elite and I will save the hand-holding for the court case..

As can be seen I have detailed recall, and identify the ‘Fake Probable Cause’ issue that this entire case has been tainted with by the investigators – either rooms are ‘secret’ or that there are ‘ssds and hard drives’ etc. Chamaree Silva’s garbage is merely the Construct of Lawyers and it fools no-one except the co-conspirators. Here is another fraud of hers, this time involving SIM cards. This is yet another video that I have recovered!

Earlier that day 04 December 2015, I had specifically told Edward de Saram that there was no reason to wash the sheets – the reason is because I was having an adult sexual relationship with Chamaree Silva and the existence of the same confirms that I am not a Paedophile. There was Forensic Evidence on the sheets obviously and I wanted to cut the sheet and bag it!

Immediately Edward de Saram started the lies about how a conversation the previous day meant that he could wash them today (04 December 2015). He cannot grasp that there was a conversation ‘this morning’ in which I had specifically told him not to, citing the reasons.

Of course he cannot grasp/does not care that him turning up to my house, pulling things and telling me what to do will irritate me no end – he has no idea of boundaries sadly and both parents suffer from Narcissistic Personality Disorder…

I even told him that the sheets were ‘blue and now they are red’. Edward de Saram despite wanting to appear self-assured asked KSA Perera, (whom the former has paid around LKR 1.3 million to for no reason). Clearly KSA Perera would agree with anyone who gave him money, like many classless Sri Lankans.

Surely if Edward de Saram was so sure why is he even asking the question? As can be heard I am precise and recalling entire segments in detail, of that which has actually occurred. Edward de Saram became confident ONLY AFTER his minion/sycophant agreed with him. I was outnumbered so was restricted in that which I could do, especially I had a serious neck injury at the time and little upper body strength.

When I said ‘I took photos’ the response Edward de Saram gave is ‘you might have taken… but the photos are wrong, because I am absolutely sure… you have got it wrong’. He continued ‘there was no sheet there… for you to sleep we put the new sheet…’

Edward de Saram’s conclusion is then ‘so your camera is lying’. his technique is to respond simply and aggressively to my statements – as soon as I refer to a camera, it is the camera that is accused of lying!

How can someone make such outrageous statements?

Clearly I was so stunned that it actually prevented me from responding – this is the power of Gaslighting.

The fraud he and KSA Perera was running was that pieces of Poisoned Dry Fish were being left around the house at night. The only parties who were in the house was KSA Perera and Edward de Saram ergo they have facilitated it.

Edward de Saram has a history of attempting to kill the pets of Tania and I, as the two recordings demonstrate. The plan was to kill Shihara and cause me psychological harm – it failed miserably because I identified PSYOPs 🙂

https://soundcloud.com/user-93619079/20160802-126959-edward-de-saram-and-cat-killing-part-1/s-nnEzF

https://soundcloud.com/user-93619079/20160802-126959-edward-de-saram-and-cat-killing-part-2/s-xjcmh

Note how Edward de Saram feigns concern into ascertaining how the Dry Fish arrived initially? It was in fact poisoned because I sampled some of it and it gave me a massive headache and caused vomiting afterwards. I have a much larger mass than Shihara!

Discussions with Liars

Edward de Saram is not convincing as a parent who actually cares, moreover he is merely going through the motions which mean nothing in reality. The conversation ends which him stating that he only wants to look into something of his choosing so despite him feigning concern, he has no interest because he knows that he and KSA Perera are responsible. I could see their guilty expressions, and the fact that Edward de Saram lowers his voice when scheming is a classic…

More Evidence of ‘Destruction of Evidence’

To demonstrate that electrical devices had been modified and connected, as well as cables switched and various frauds were occurring, I took copious amounts of photos. Unfortunately they had all been destroyed. Thankfully I have just recovered them 🙂

The sheets were clearly blue and there were clearly body fluids on the sheet – this is yet another example of Destruction of Evidence, packaged as something else by Edward de Saram. He came to Sri Lanka to give Margaret Cunniffe and everyone under the sun some type of defence, though nicely confirmed the nature of the cabal as the parties he defends are the parties who are involved 🙂

Other Evidence Recovered on 17 December 2016

Ray Callingham’s HMRC form, the original which I have which necessitated the Fake Probable Cause:-

Note the photocopy and the original. Note how the photocopy is typed correctly, but the original (which is the one required by HMRC) is not. This was no mistake, Ray is a Fellow of the CAEW, and additionally other recordings with Ray confirm he knew that the original HMRC form was required…

Ray was not happy when I filled in Beeley Hawley & Co myself – he wanted me to leave it blank but signed in full. That in itself demonstrates he was acting as an agent of a third party and not acting in his own capacity.

By way of information, had I allowed Ray to take the form with him, parties would have opened up all Corporate Entities, Trust Structures and essentially anything that I was associated with.

However Ray and the Investigators and/or Police are nothing short of fools, and they need to reappraise their strategy against someone with vastly superior intellect, combined with defence and law enforcement experience!

Most importantly they need to stop Perverting the Course of Justice to achieve their ends, and ‘wake up and smell the coffee’ 🙂

Fake Probable Cause

I like the way that the torch has been positioned along with a note that I deliberately wrote a week or so ago with the words ‘keep these safe’ and had put in my trouser pocket! So the note suddenly appeared on a table with some DVDs, Rhodium Letterheads, passwords, a USB drive as well as a Micro sd card.

I do not even arrange drives like that – it was set up in that way and photographed to try and obtain a search warrant for those items elsewhere – very sad and obviously fraudulent. My stuff EVERYWHERE has been SANITISED so good luck finding anything. If something has been obtained then there is an intelligent explanation that plebians would not be able to elucidate on their own.

Reviewing the EXIF information on those photos will reveal the same time period, as well as the time-stamp may be at night 🙂

Note the photocopy and the original. Note how the photocopy is typed correctly, but the original (which is the one required by HMRC) is not. This was no mistake, Ray is a Fellow of the CAEW, and additionally other recordings with Ray confirm he knew that the original HMRC form was required…

Replacement of Cables

I do not have time to roll my cables like this – in a working environment everything is out and straight, because it is used all the time. These USB cables introduced malware onto our local area networks, and conveniently bypassed hardware firewalls.

I knew about the NSA attacks for years due to my ‘other’ work around 2009 (when I was summoned to the Bahamas for training), and Cottonmouth in particular:-

This video was only released 3 months ago and this type of attack needs an insider and attacker in close proximity. This is how my passwords were continually compromised and systems using decryption keys of 4096 bits were compromised in less than a minute 🙂

BIOS Hacked

As can be seen the BIOS of one of my systems has been modified, and this often leads to spelling mistakes on the display. Commercial Manufacturers do not make these type of errors. What does ‘failly’ mean exactly – it used to say ‘failed’ before December 2015!

IMSI Catchers

The following are screenshots of two of my Samsung SM-A500G mobiles, the Mobile Network Code is 04 and 11 on 21 October 2015. Both of these are non-commercial networks,which are not even listed in Sri Lanka.

It either means a military aspect to this fraudulent bullshit and/or a Foreign Party is involved, typically by the use of a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty request. Had they provided the Fake Base Transceiver Stations (IMSI Catchers) then that would explain how I was able to detect non-commercial MNCs.

The Hegelian Dialectic

The Psychiatric Scam is just a charade and is the classic Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis, also known as Problem, Reaction, Solution.

(a) Joe de Saram has evidence which nails everyone, and the perpetrators want it.

(b) Edward de Saram turns up to creates a crisis, thereby removing Joe from his house.

(c) Joe returns to the house and finds the evidence destroyed and the perpetrators have the evidence. However it is sadly (for them) less than 5% – ha ha!)

Even this Attorney could grasp the Psychiatric Scam:-

https://soundcloud.com/user-93619079/20160118-parents-organising-fraud1/s-iuSAW

Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1021430/the-art-of-deception-training-for-a-new.pdf

This is just the tip of the iceberg sadly, and I can understand what Edward Snowden and Julian Assange are going through. I have extremely robust evidence, dare I say it ‘irrefutable’ and will provide it at the right time in order to collapse the case 🙂

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

More on Gaslighting

More on Gaslighting

Gaslighters deny the truth by conveniently forgetting that which actually transpired to protect themselves, to humiliate their victims and to remove all credibility from their victims.

https://soundcloud.com/user-93619079/20160802-105431-praxy-de-saram-two-faced-lies-denials-1/s-7ZQqJ

https://soundcloud.com/user-93619079/20160802-105431-praxy-de-saram-two-faced-lies-denials-2/s-ONxrg

Doctors Exposed

By | Z MIGRATION IN PROGESS B

Doctors Exposed (±x)

Published on 30th November 2016
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
437

Enter more text here

On 17 December 2015, I was subjected to one of the most ridiculous frauds that I have ever seen, in fact worse than the ones that law enforcement run to entrap people 🙂

I am still getting over the destruction of evidentiary materials and every day I locate new recordings demonstrating the fraud perpetrated by Edward de Saram and Praxy de Saram amongst others. However, I am extremely resilient so it is just another day in the office.

In view of the voluminous amount of materials Tania and I have, we have decided to publish the same to (a) enable others to identify the warnings early on and (b) to share evidentiary materials before another scam takes away another strong position from us 🙂

The various psychiatrist ‘batchmates’ of the above will have their recordings published and their licensing will certainly be an issue for them. Eventually we will make it a commercial site with lawyers and advice for pursuing medical negligence claims.

As there is a lot of information, we have the main site, as well as the sub-sites.

Doctors.exposed – the main site with sub-sites bearing the name of the doctor in the format xxx.yyy.zzz.doctors.exposed, in which xxx relates to the first name of the doctor, yyy relates to the surname of the doctor and zzz relates to the ISO 3166 country code where they practise. A worked example for Dr Yuri Zhivago would be http://yuri.zhivago.rus.doctors.exposed .

Doctors with non-medical issues (such as those running frauds on behalf of fools) will also be featured. As an introduction to the new site, we are launching with the following recording:-

The ‘hello’ may be from a different person, Dr Prasad doesn’t seem to know his own girlfriend’s name and takes 9 seconds to provide it and the entire conversation is staged as usual 🙂

It relates to a case we have against Margaret Cunniffe and David Brown, in which parties in Sri Lanka are trying to entrap me, and provide the foregoing fraudsters with a pseudo-defence – another McDonald Slater & Lay Construct no less!

The recording took place about a week or so from memory, after the case was filed in the Supreme Court of Victoria for Defamation.

I of course have UK and LK Citizenships and was born in Colombo, but I am disappointed that Sri Lanka is still one of the most corrupt countries in the world and the GroupThink prefers to keep it that way…

Accordingly do NOT accept any third party evidence purportedly obtained from Sri Lanka or a country in which Sri Lankans are able to obtain a visa on arrival (such as Singapore and Bahamas) – there are numerous [albeit dim] forces at work 🙂

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP