A Sealed Indictment
Enter more text here
I refer to the following article entitled ‘Bungled court filing cites charges against Assange’ dated 16 November 2018 and appearing at CNN.
Bungled court filing cites charges against Assange
(CNN)A pair of references to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in an unrelated court filing reveals US government efforts to charge him.
There are two key paragraphs in the above article, and these are as follows:-
(A) ‘Another procedure short of sealing will not adequately protect the needs of law enforcement at this time because, DUE TO THE SOPHISTICATION OF THE DEFENDANT AND THE PUBLICITY SURROUNDING THE CASE, no other procedure is likely to keep confidential the fact that Assange has been charged,” prosecutors wrote in the August 22 filing that was later unsealed on November 8, sitting undetected for days on the public docket.”
(B) “The complaint, supporting affidavit, and arrest warrant, as well as this motion and the proposed order, WOULD NEED TO REMAIN SEALED UNTIL ASSANGE IS ARRESTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE CHARGES IN THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND CAN THEREFORE NO LONGER EVADE OR AVOID ARREST AND EXTRADITION IN THIS MATTER,” prosecutors added in the filing..”
Relevance to Joe
How I Met Big Brother - GeniusJoe v MI5
The UK Surveillance State The above video confirms the UK’s obsession with electronic surveillance and human rights violations in the present. The Investigatory Powers Act 2016 is illegal. However as many people know, this obsession is not a new thing and it is in fact public knowledge that I was the first person to discover and publicly disclose the fact that
and my hundreds of articles relate to publicity:-
Joe's Rendition was a Military Intelligence Operation
[THE REALLY ODD THING IS THAT I WAS ALREADY RELOCATING TO THE UK, HAD LOOKED AT PET TRANSPORTATION PEEPS AND HAD SET UP THREE NEW UK COMPANIES. Q SO WHY THE IRREGULAR RENDITION TO A COUNTRY I WAS ALREADY GOING TO?
In relation to the second paragraph ‘would need to remain sealed until assange is arrested’ is very’ is extremely interesting – the Psychiatric Fraud is relevant because it was the method by which my decision-making ability was fraudulently obtained by Edward de Saram. In fact I recall sitting at my dinner table on 17 December 2015 and when he was up to his usual antics I stated that I would challenge any extradition request and easily succeed.
It was only after then that he became more violent than usual and I was subjected to aggravated kidnap (including torture), and unlawful imprisonment.
To ensure that I was effectively in custody (note the parallel to Julian Assange), he arranged for the psychiatric report to fraudulently state that I needed ‘involuntary admission’.
Essentially the unlawful search and seizure occurred first (and I was unlawfully detained during the same)
Unlawful Imprisonment by Police in Cleveland Resulted in GBP 550,000 Damages Award
Cleveland Police in huge damages payout to lawyer I refer to the article entitled Solicitor wins £550,000 for false imprisonment published in The Guardian on 11 May 2013.
The mere fact that I got out without a medical report in my favour confirms the absence of mental disease and more importantly the fundamental human rights violations which Edward de Saram’s complete lack of boundaries facilitate.
Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)